this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
88 points (87.3% liked)

Games

32976 readers
1310 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QubaXR@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

With no steam release I'm taking the same route. Love looking at remedy games, don't enjoy playing them.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wish I could play it, but I don't think my PC could handle it, being right at the edge of minimum specs. Has anyone played it on a 2060? I can live with 1080p and no Ray Tracing but I'm scared of sub-30 FPS.

[–] beefcat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

it is ok on a 2060. the high minimum spec is not because of performance, but because older GPUs do not support mesh shaders. that is why it runs ok on a 2060 while being unplayable on the much faster 1080 Ti

[–] Hurmeli@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I've read it runs just fine on min spec. They made them very conservative.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 4 points 1 year ago

Forgot to mention I have a gaming laptop. So not equivalent of the 2060 in performance, although it contains the mesh shader support so it won't literally refuse to run. But seeing as the desktop variant is minimum spec I'm not optimistic.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Im just too stingy to pay >60 bucks for a game. I usually watch lets plays of AAA games.

[–] maniel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's the thing for me too, I'll just buy it on sale in a few years, trying to not watch gameplays of games I'm interested in to not break it for me, made that mistake before with Horizon Zero Dawn, watched gameplays, read whole wiki of lore being sure it won't be available in PC, few months later PC version was announced, bought it on a sale about year later, still had a lot of fun though

[–] KidDogDad@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Anyone have a recommendation for a good let’s play of this? Anytime I’m thinking about watching a let’s play I never know who to pick.

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been watching and enjoying Jesse Cox (on his CoxClips youtube) play it. He knows a lot about the universe lore and does some explaining for people who may not be as familiar. Someone related to the game also mailed him some ARG stuff related to the game before it came out and he did a few videos on his jessecox channel for it.

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Cox also isn't obnoxious. He was part of the TotalBiscuit John Bain group that were fairly sensible and quiet channels.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 3 points 1 year ago

I think Welonz is great. She's played Alan Wake 1, Control and the AWE DLC before so is well familiar with the story and always pays close attention to story games.

I've been hesitant to buy it out of performance concerns and have been watching her instead.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

MKIceandFire on YouTube. All they do are lets-plays with no commentary most of the bullshit cut out.

[–] a_fine_hound@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I wish this game scared me, but the horror is too cheap to really impact me.

[–] quain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

"Musical" mission was worth suffering through all those jump scares for me - I'm not a horror fan, but decided to force myself a bit and I must say - it's really good.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

it's a shame that remedy don't see any of the money if you watch the whole thing though, but yeah it's always valid to just watch a game. it's a testament to how enjoyable some games can be across all sections

i would say gameplay is the weakest part of a remedy game, with everything else pulling it along with how excellent it is

[–] CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a really interesting concept. What if developers had paid or ad supported official streams? Sure most people would block the ads or continue to watch their favorite streamer, but a non-zero amount of players might elect to watch the devs play the game in an effort to support them directly. And this would just be additive revenue compared to the zero they are getting right now on streams. It might even be synergistic as official advertisement for the game and as a way to connect directly to their community. I could see it also as a way to play a game but with director commentary on, similar to how movies do it.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ad supported official streams might be enough to be noticeable amount of income for one person for a few weeks, but not really for a big company that produces something like a game.

same reason you don't get movies/tv on youtube. money isn't there for a company

Good point, makes sense

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

If you truly felt this way, you would buy it anyway and then watch the game playthrough as suggested.

The idea of watching playthough's has some controversial facets for sure but I'm not really gonna yuck someone's yum

[–] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Don't you need like. 4xxx GPU to run it? I think it said my 3060 wasn't good enough

[–] micka190@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Digital Foundry made a video about it. Basically, you need a card that supports new rendering technologies that only started appearing on Nvidia cards after the GTX 10XX series (not sure for AMD). The game actually looks good on lower graphics. Putting everything on low won't make it look like a PS2 game. The path tracing will absolutely demolish your performance, though, but that's to be expected because it's insane to expect real-time path tracing to do anything else with the current hardware (think of their path tracing as a tech demo more than an actual feature).

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

iruno, ps5 plays it fine? i don't know what that is in pc terms tho

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Depends on if you want ray tracing, but running it is as low as a 2060 and even a 3060 is recommended without ray tracing for 1440 at medium, which is supposed to still look pretty good.

https://www.gamesradar.com/alan-wake-2-minimum-recommended-requirements-pc-specs/

Minimum
Graphics preset - Low
Resolution - 1080p
FPS - 30
GPU - GeForce RTX 2060 / Radeon RX 6600

Medium
Graphics preset - Medium
Resolution - 1440p
FPS - 30
GPU - GeForce RTX 3060 / Radeon RX 6600 XT

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m playing on my 2080 TI, it’s playable and enjoyable. Just doesn’t look as nice as it clearly has the potential to look.

[–] farcaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I enjoyed Alan Wake 2, but there's a lot of creepiness and jump scares. Way more than the first game. Wouldn't recommend it to anyone unduly unnerved by horror.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I can't play horror games, I freeze when I'm scared. Thank goodness for Let's Plays, get all the content I want without needing to demonstrate to myself that my instincts haven't changed.