this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
55 points (95.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35806 readers
1471 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm confused as to how this would work; my understanding is that the Q&A format is fairly strictly enforced, and witnesses can't just spout except as a response to a direct question - would you have to pull a zootopia?

But of course if you can't, that would be pretty damn limiting if you literally aren't allowed to speak in your own defense.

Not that it's ever a good idea, of course - but how does it work?

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IANAL, but per this StackExchange question, this is one of the answers for that:

Yes, though there is a procedure for in that doesn't involve running back and forth (don't do this as the bailiff will tackle you).

The defendant will almost always need to take the stand. There are two ways this can be done. Which is permitted depends on the judge.

The first, more common method is that the defendant gives a statement without being questioned. This would include all relevant facts that would normally be given by answers to their lawyer's questions.

After this statement is given, the prosecution will cross-examine as usual.

The second is more similar to what you describe- the defendant plays the role of asker and answerer. The defendant does not run back and forth and should probably refrain from doing a silly voice for the lawyer part but yes, they ask questions and answer them. This was used in United States v. Nivica, 887 F.2d 1110 (1st Cir. 1989).

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the way it happens in Jury Duty is how it should work. Dude asks himself a question from the lectern, then runs to the stand to answer it, then runs back to the lectern to ask the next one, then runs back to the stand to answer it, etc.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Permission to treat the witness as hostile?

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

He who represents himself has a fool for a client.

[–] DRx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I am not sure if it is common place; however Rodney Alcala famously cross-examined himself

[–] Ignacio@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I couldn't find any information about calling yourself in court as witness while you're being represented by yourself. The best I could find is this information about self representation.

load more comments
view more: next ›