this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
33 points (92.3% liked)

PlayStation

5225 readers
2 users here now

The PlayStation community for Lemmy! Come and join us for daily news and discussions!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No console wars or PC elitism. We are all gamers.
  4. Be a decent human.
  5. No piracy talk, links, or directions to copy-written content. Emulation discussions are allowed.
  6. No NSFW content, shilling, self promotion, ads, spam, low effort posts, memes, trolling, etc.
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
  8. Do not make false reports. If you believe a post is a borderline rule break that is fine, but using the report feature as a super-downvote is not allowed. You will be met with a warning, followed by a ban for abuse of the report feature.
  9. Have fun!

Other Gaming Communities:

Remote Play Resources:


For questions, collabs, or really anything, message me directly at: @cosmicsploogedrizzle:matrix.org


SEO Tags: PlayStation 5 , PS5 , Game , Gaming , Games , Sony , Studios , Nintendo , Xbox , Microsoft , Next Gen , Unreal , Decima Engine , Exclusive , Dualshock , Dualsense , Dual Sense , SIE , Sony Interactive Entertainment , HBO , The Last of Us , Horizon , Spiderman , Spider-man , Spider Man , God of War , PSVR , Virtual Reality , MLB , Returnal , Death Stranding , Ratchet and Clank , Ghost of Tsushima , Demon’s Souls , Naughty Dog , Santa Monica , Housemarque , Sucker Punch , Bungie , Destiny , Insomniac , Guerilla , Bend , Asobi , San Diego

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Project Q is the upcoming streaming only device that will allow you to play games installed on a PlayStation 5 remotely.
It has not been announced if the handheld will allow streaming of games from the cloud and is rumoured to cost between £250 - £300.

Will you be picking one up later this year?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely not. If it's a streaming device that means I have to be near high-speed wifi to use it. For the same price you can get a steam deck which can play thousands of games.

[–] 47_Alpha_Tango@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Yeah it’s why I’m on the fence about a Steam Deck. I’m stuck between a Project Q and gaming PC or just getting a Steam Deck with a dock and monitor so my gaming PC is like a Switch. Is that possible with a Steam Deck?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. Lack of money. Otherwise I'd get SteamDeck instead anyway.

[–] 47_Alpha_Tango@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Tell me about it. It why I’m still playing GT7 on a TV instead of in VR.

[–] Secret300@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The PS Vita is still to this day my favorite handheld and sony killed it. Then they come out with this and wonder why Nintendo has always been on top for handhelds. This product is honestly a shit in the face of PS fans and I'm genuinely concerned for the well being of anyone dumb enough to buy this. Now that I got that rant out of the way.

Nah I won't be buying one. I really wish sony would make a new handheld like the vita tho instead of a tablet with a controller glued on

[–] 47_Alpha_Tango@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I completely agree. I too still regularly use my Vita. Considering it’s an 11 year old piece of hardware it still feels up to date.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I just plugged in my Vita for charging after a long time, wasn't expecting to see it mentioned right away.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess I am in a huge minority of people who is interested in it. Though the caveat is that it must be $150 or under. I am not willing to spend $250+ on such a device.

As for why, the convenience. For me, this is the addon that makes PS5 a hybrid console, like a Switch.

[–] arikarin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I’m interested as well, I’m just a bit hesitant because my experience with remote play has been so-so. It works well for turn based games but for any type of game where you need to react quickly to things it’s a little frustrating to use. Hoping that having a dedicated machine to do it and not using an app would help though. It would be nice to be able to play anywhere in the house, my PS5 is in the basement and sometimes I’d just rather be in a different room. Sitting in a dark basement all day can get depressing haha.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. Not great for fighting games or quick action games. But there are tons of genres that work great with it. Like turn based RPGs, farming games, many indies and so on, and hopefully it will work better on a dedicated device.

[–] arikarin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So far Slay The Spire is the main thing I’ve used remote play for haha, perfect game for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GONADS125@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

No, I've still got my original PSP and it's homebrewed. Also got a switch.

[–] Shinpai@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With the way remote play works atm no chance. Seems the tech is not there yet for play without massive input lag and latency

[–] 47_Alpha_Tango@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is a shame as it doesn’t need to be that way. Remote play from my PS4 Pro to my Vita is almost perfect. I don’t think I’ve played Fall Guys on my PS5 for months. It’s like it’s made for the Vita. Plus the OLED screen is gorgeous.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like Sony should do a Xbox series S type of move but with a handheld that can play all the PS5 games instead at lowered graphics. At least that's what I'd want. Switch has shown people are more than fine with even 480p resolution and sub 30 fps and low settings when it comes to portability.

[–] 47_Alpha_Tango@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ll take lower resolution any day if it means I can play AAA games on the toilet.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Yes it is amazing. And 40 hz is something I opt for so frequently even if the game can output 60 just for the battery life. It is really impressive how it's turned into a really nice middle ground to 30 where it makes 30 feel rough.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This device has no value on its own. When the PS Vita tried to do this with the PS4, I loved the concept, because playing something like Horizon remotely was awesome, but it was doomed to fail because of the horrible networking hardware. The difference is that the Vita had a gigantic game library on it's own, for less money too

[–] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I'm waiting for a Steam Deck with an OLED. That's my choice of handled.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty happy with the Steam Deck not only as a way to play my pc games locally, but it's also very easy to set up and stream games from your PS5, game pass, or stream from your gaming pc. Sony's concept isn't bad, it's just inflexible and in the age of full fledged handheld gaming pc's starting at $400, doesn't make a ton of sense for me.

[–] lapommedeterre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably not, but I think if people could get it to work with PC for game streaming, it'd be even more enticing so that you can use it for both PS5 and PC. Maybe someone like Valve will work with Sony.

[–] 47_Alpha_Tango@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can’t the Steam Deck do that with the remote play app for Windows? Plus it’s also a gaming PC. I’m considering picking one up instead of a Project Q.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Chiaki is the one they use and I think it works on Linux. Streaming (even locally) kind of sucks so I don't use it, but I see it mentioned all the time.

I could see choosing this over the steam deck if it was like $100, but if it's $300 I don't see how you don't get to $400 for the Steam Deck instead. You'll probably want to add storage eventually, but even if you stuck to small indie/2D stuff that will fit in 64GB, that adds a huge amount of value.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lapommedeterre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, pretty much. SteamDeck can basically do whatever any PC can do.

I'm trying to think what would make Project Q more enticing than it being just a device that's locked to PS5 only, lol. If Sony released PC software for streaming to it, it would up the appeal quite a bit.

I already have a SteamDeck and stream to a phone, so I'm not in for a Project Q but I can think of some friends who'd probably get one of it had functionality outside of only the PS5.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even phones can do easily with Steam and then just get a controller and a controller mount. For the price that is being asked of project q and not even being able to play games natively the phone and controller route is way I'd go instead dropping money on that. Way too much with the options available now with handhelds that are full blown computers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Why would I drop £250-300 on this when I could pay £100 for Backbone One, and use remote play on my phone.

[–] PBPunch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It will really depend on its full function. I hope what they have shown is not the end of the product because as it stands now, no. I can't image the price point being low enough to justify a purchase.

Going to come down to <=$200 price point and inclusion of HDR screen that gets fairly bright. I can already remote play on my steamdeck, but the 720p non-hdr screen that isn't super bright and no cool haptics and triggers, are the only drawbacks

[–] exohuman@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I want one. I have a PS5 and find myself not using it due to it not being portable like my laptop or Switch. It would have to be a cheaper price though to justify spending.

Just seems way behind the available options already. Just the deck and ally have more viability not needing a console and not doing that PS5 to cloud to "Q" thing. Strange choice.

[–] Solrac@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No thanks, I've already a steamdeck

[–] Tesco@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand the point of this thing. For the same price you could just buy another telly for a different room and move the console, it's not like it takes much effort to unplug two wires. I honestly can't think of a single scenario where it would be useful to own one.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I probably would agree with you before but I got a Steam Deck and it’s been amazing. Games that aren’t too intensive can play on the handheld and anything else streams from my gaming PC. Sony should have made a new Vita that competes with that. Instead this seems to be streaming only.

[–] Tesco@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I get the appeal of the Steam Deck, especially for people who travel alot, though I personally wouldn't get one.

But this has to be on the same network as your ps5 doesn't it? So the only time this is ever going to be useful is if your partner or something wants to use the main TV and is more expensive then just buying a litte monitor or something for your bedroom, so what's the point in it? The ps5 isn't exactly heavy or awkward to move like my gaming PC is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›