this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
498 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19170 readers
5773 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A new indictment filed Tuesday charged U.S. Rep. George Santos with stealing the identities of donors to his campaign and then using their credit cards to ring up tens of thousands of dollars in unauthorized charges.

Prosecutors said some of that stolen money ended up in his own bank account.

The 23-count indictment replaces one filed earlier against the New York Republican charging him with embezzling money from his campaign and lying to Congress about his wealth, among other offenses.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s incredible that guys like him and Menendez don’t immediately step down. People are so wrapped up in party politics, they don’t even care about ethical standards.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was just gold bullion from his savings account withdrawn over the Years in case of emergency. You know, like we all do.

[–] weedazz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Apparently Costco is selling gold bars now, should I get some?

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Gold is a hedge against inflation. It is only a good idea to buy if the Economy is going to hell. Also, if you are buying gold for anything but ornamentation, do so through better sources as the retail big boxes have too high a mark up and you pay far more than you must and should. In reality, if you have enough money to care about buying gold for "investment", you should let those decisions be made by a qualified advisor.

[–] Alchemy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Do they have them back in stock? If so, always a good time to grab gold.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dumbass saw Trump getting away with shit and thought, “Me too!” Only he’s not Trump and even Trump might finally see some consequences.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's gotta be a few like MTG who are sweating a little bit right now, knowing that the authorities are actually going after their illegal activities

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Her name is Empty G.
MTG is already taken and we are not sharing it with that moron.

[–] Zitronensaft@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MTG is more clear than Empty G. There isn't a lot of overlap between politics and ridiculously expensive card games, use context clues to figure out which one people are discussing.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

I stand by my position and comment.
PS try https://cockatrice.github.io/ to solve the cost issue with context clues about the overlap between politics and ridiculously expensive card games if you are having issues.

[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If only the left had a propaganda machine equal to one-tenth of Fox News, we could make this a punchline for the next five years at least. Sadly its comedic value will be squandered.

[–] arensb@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're not the kind of authoritarian follower that propaganda machines like Fox work best with. We have our flaws; just not that particular one.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Which is why the ones directed at the left all failed and they focused solely on the right. Some outrage farm misinfo site owners flat out admitted that the left would more often than not validate before sharing.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You'd need unscrupulous billionaires to get involved but unscrupulous billionaires aren't generally lefties.

[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We can play the greed right into our hands

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why isn't this asshat in prison already?

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Conservative immunity.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Politicians are famously blind to crooks.

[–] ale@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Politicians are famously ~~blind to~~ crooks.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm sensing a pattern!

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Santos not doing anything shitty for 5 seconds challenge (impossible)

[–] Infinity187@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

This guy just can't catch a break cause he never gave himself one. What a fucking asshat.

All he had to do was be a normal human being.

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Must be fun trying to find the most abhorrent photos of politicians when writing an article about them.

[–] Aussie_Damo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Couldn't happen to a nicer guy....

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I am not surprised

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The 23-count indictment replaces one filed earlier against the New York Republican charging him with embezzling money from his campaign and lying to Congress about his wealth, among other offenses.

In one case, he charged $12,000 to a contributor’s credit card and transferred the “vast majority” of that money into his personal bank account, prosecutors said.

Santos is also accused of falsely reporting to the Federal Elections Commission that he had loaned $500,000 to his campaign in an attempt to convince Republican Party officials that he was a serious candidate, when he actually had less than $8,000 in his personal accounts.

The new charges deepen the legal peril for Santos, who likely faces a lengthy prison term if convicted.

Santos’ personal and professional biography as a wealthy businessman began to unravel soon after winning election to represent Long Island and Queens last year, revealing a tangled web of deception.

In addition to lying to voters — about his distinguished Wall Street background, Jewish heritage, academic and athletic achievements, animal rescue work, real estate holdings and more — Santos is accused of carrying out numerous fraud schemes meant to enrich himself and mislead his donors.


The original article contains 357 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 46%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It’s pathological with this guy. Like trump, he literally cannot stop himself.