this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
42 points (82.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35833 readers
1297 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I just checked and those rules are wild.

Posting a picture of a slice of cheese without a NSFW tag and a content warning is bannable but calling violence against large groups of people isn't.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holy hell that sounds like a parody community made by 4chan.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep and like 4chan It’s full of Russian propaganda. Just look at how many of their posts reference Ukrainian Nazis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] YaBoyMax@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It appears to be a rule against posting food made from animal products. As someone who doesn't eat animal products myself, I don't particularly enjoy scrolling Reddit or Lemmy and seeing a picture of a meat dish, but it doesn't ruin my day I would never dream of demanding a content warning for it.

To my knowledge CWs are geared towards content that has the potential to trigger past trauma, and I can't understand how a food category could be so broadly traumatic to someone (outside of EDs I guess, which is obviously not the focus of this rule).

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suspect it's less of a trigger warning, and more of a means to reframe perceptions of food.

Like, if TV commercials just started putting little "viewers may find the following depictions of dead animals disturbing" stingers before a commercial of a family eating steaks, it might change perceptions over time.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's exactly what it is.

Homelander drinking a consenting woman's breast milk is disturbing and helps convince viewers he's a creep. Yet if he were to enjoy a nice glass of refreshing cow breast milk, that would be completely normal. Why? Because our society has made a very deliberate choice not to consider there being anything wrong with milking a cow.

Hexbear simply does not participate in that choice. On Hexbear, there is something disturbing about milking a cow, and that's because the admins want you to be disturbed by it. That has always been the default state of things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately trigger warnings got watered down very quickly, to now also being used as an "anything someone might find the slightest discomfort in"

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just don't understand them. The users I mean.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are a platform that welcomes anyone who wants to be here in good faith. With that said, we are also an intentionally leftist platform; conservative and reactionary ideologies will not be tolerated here.

They live in an idolgical bubble where contrary opinions are not tolerated, and dissent is shunned. The only voices they hear are leftist and extreme leftist voices shifting the Overton window of politics in their minds leading to radical beliefs.

It's important to have your beliefs challenged at times, they lack that. If you can try and listen to voices from opposing view points, maybe even share your own in a respectful manner.

(This isn't an issue particular to any side of politics, it also occurs in more right wing groups)

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess I've been really surprised at their support for Palestine.

I thought that the left would be less supportive of the more conservative religion

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think they support Palestine as much as they oppose colonialism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They're trolls. Is most of the world supporting XYZ? We are suddenly against XYZ for reasons! Is someone giving actual real life reasons to support XYZ? We have to reply with emojis!

They're very gang oriented. Once one of them declares an opinion the rest of them must follow it and defend it no matter what.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

In their general rules:

Any pictures of food containing animal products, including but not limited to meat, cheese, or egg, must be tagged nsfw along with food discussion content warnings (CW: Food).

Animal Liberation is essential to any leftist movement, including platforms like Hexbear. Volunteers, comments, and posts, should not be anti-vegan, although users and volunteers are not required to be vegan.

Wow. Just wow. That is so far beyond leftist.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's like if Fox News was to create a leftist website. It smells so fake.

[–] dope@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A satire of leftism? I'd call it too obvious but look how popular it is.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Trumps campaign got off the ground from internet memes and satire groups on places like 4chan and reddit. There's so many idiots out there looking for something to grasp onto and make their identity. You can't get a satire/parody group too large or it breaths life of it's own.

Poes law: without a clear indicator of the author's intent, any parodic or sarcastic expression of extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of those views.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rosymind@leminal.space 9 points 1 year ago

That's so far left, it's behind

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know, you see a cow being shot and cut up, it's NSFW. You put some parsley on it, it's now food.

[–] Huxleywaswrite@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. That's how that works

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's generally how human brains work. We're capable of switching empathy on and off, allowing us to both hunt and love animals, protect our group and fight the others, be careful not to hurt others and perform surgery... People are paradoxical creatures.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I believe they do, yes. It's done to out anti-trans people, making them easy to spot as they complain loudly about being forced to.

[–] populustree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, it's unverifiable and unenforceable. Personally, I wouldn't sign up for anything that requires identifying myself like that. I can just look at someone's comment history to see if they're strongly pro or anti tolerance. As it stands, this has as much value as as North Korea calling themselves democratic.

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Unverifiable maybe, unenforceable, no. They simply ban anyone who refuses.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

what if I honestly dgaf and prefer that people call me whatever they want?

[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Any" is probably fine. It tends to be my choice. That said, you're better off just not using Hexbear. Ya know, unless you're chill with things like genocide.

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

Then you put that I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)

Until some random doxes people.

You'd think, after seeing bitching posts about privacy one after the other folks would be concerned.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (35 children)

It's part of the signing up process. I've seen people without them, but it's very rare. There's probably a grace period.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What if my preferred pronouns are to not have any?

[–] Critical_Insight@feddit.uk 31 points 1 year ago

None/use name seems to be an option aswell

[–] DrQuint@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Shadow the Hedgehog.

[–] korfuri@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How should people refer to you in the third person? It's okay to use one's name as the preferred pronoun.

[–] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

please do not refer to me

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A name is a noun, not a pronoun, but the site seems to allow "none/use name" as an option.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Foggy is confused 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›