this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
724 points (94.8% liked)

Science Memes

11068 readers
3546 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 97 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fun fact time, -40F is -40C.

And 575F is 575K

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 68 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Fahrenheit is a strange scale.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

It's just designed with a slightly different set of assumptions.

Instead of water freezing and boiling 100° apart, it's 180° in fahrenheit. That makes it so that they're on the opposite sides of a temperature gauge, and a degree of rotation of the gauge matches a degree of temperature.
Instead of zero being the freezing point of water under specific conditions, it's a brine solution whose temperature will stabilize in a way that's useful for using as a calibration point.

Stripped of its context, it's odd. But it's not irrational, just no longer consensus as the standard, and as such deprecated.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 71 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Based on human perception, based on water chemistry, based on physics.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You'll be shocked to learn that the distance in Kelvin is also adjusted to water "chemistry", albeit changing the aggregate state seems more physics to me, since no molceules are reacting with each other.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thankfully that has been redefined using the Boltzmann constant, so now anyone in the universe can agree on °C and K without needing to measure any Vienna standard ocean water.

[–] _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I was going to make a joke about how Austria is landlocked, how did we come up with the idea of making an ocean water standard.

Apparently the IAEA which is headquartered here set that standard, for anyone else curious.

load more comments (3 replies)

Nah Kelvin is just on hydrogen perspective

(Kelvin and Celsius are the same scale just with different 0)

[–] rainynight65@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Zero Fahrenheit is the freezing point of brine (of a certain concentration). That's water chemistry.

Originally, 90F was based on the average human body temperature, but that later changed to 96F, which just goes to show how arbitrary that scale is.

[–] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's all arbitrary. Someone just decided to base a scale off of something and that something isn't fixed from the start. The meter used to be based off the measurement of the earth, but now it's based off of light.

It's just some random semi-useful starting point that we all agree on so we're using the same language.

[–] rainynight65@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

The meter did not change, science has merely defined it more precisely and reliably over time. It is a measure of length, still one 40 millionth of the circumference of the earth through the poles. Other definitions like the speed of light definition will give you the same result. These newer definitions have reduced uncertainty and added ways to reproduce its length by natural means. But it's not like the 'original' meter was shorter or longer than today's meter, at least not by any noticeable margin.

Shifting the top end of a temperature scale by over five percent of the scale is a bit more arbitrary than that.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago

So, Kelvin in Physics, Celsius in daily usage and Fahrenheit...?

[–] mathterdark@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Fahrenheit: how hot humans feel

Celsius: how hot water feels

Kelvin & Rankine: how hot atoms feel

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I don’t think how hot humans feel works at all, it’s just arbitrary

Can humans survive 100 degree heat? Yes so it doesn’t represent 100%

150 for 3rd degree burns (almost instant), does Fahrenheit go off base 150? Also no

What about cold? Well -40 requires a lot of layers, so then +40 should be pretty hot for humans right? Nope, because it’s not related to humans at all

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

100°F was supposed to be average human body temp. Guy who made the scale fucked up his math and we ended up actually at 98.6°F

[–] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah, that's a myth. It's actually a little more complicated than that, and the actual measurements changed over time.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Espi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If farenheit represents how humans feel then 50 is the most comfortable temperature right?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] guriinii@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Since when is 0°C "fairly cold" it's literally freezing.

[–] morhp@lemmy.wtf 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

0°C is completely fine with jeans and a thick jacket, especially when it's sunny and there isn't much wind. It's cold, but there's probably not much ice or snow, if anything, probably mostly slush.

Compared to say -20 C where you should have a good ski jacket and ski pants, warm shoes and socks, generally multiple layers everywhere, winter gloves and so on.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It can be -20 C and you can be still fine with jeans and a jacket if it isn't windy.

What I'm saying is temperature alone doesn't tell you the whole story.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 37 points 1 year ago

It is also literally melting.

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been in -37C snow shoveling. Since then 0C doesn't even register as cold to me

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Yep, and I've been in 110C in sauna. It's pretty fucking hot but not death

[–] obbelusk@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I think more that if it's 100c outside the planet is basically dead.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kn33@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

The northern half of the US laughs

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The temperature that water freezes at is only fairly cold weather by a lot of people's perception.
I'd call it "chilly". No jacket for running to the mailbox, or if I'll be outside for half an hour or so. Light jacket otherwise. I don't expect it to snow, since it's not actually cold enough usually, and there won't be ice on the ground unless it's just warmed up.

So it might be "freezing", but that doesn't make it cold.

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's almost like being 'fairly cold for humans' is a wide range, and subjective, therefore useless as a baseline.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd like to propose a discussion between a person from Arizona and a person from Alaska to define what is "Really hot outside"

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Im from Texas, and 100F is "stay inside in the AC" weather. I bet an Arizonan would say the same.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Being from a particularly hot or cold location doesn't make you immune to heat or cold, it makes you a connoisseur of heat and cold. You get better at recognizing gradations of extreme temperature (knowing which are uncomfortable and which can literally kill you if you're not careful), you learn how to plan ahead and dress for the weather, and you develop emotional coping systems for extremes.

But if it's either 100°F or 0°F, no matter where you're from, that's a temperature to be wary of.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Celcius is the logical choice. The others are just crazy.

[–] nyoooom@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kelvin and Celsius are the same, just offset onto absolute zero or the water freezing point

[–] SexyPolariton@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, often it is just way more convenient to use the Kelvin scale without any negative temperatures for some calculations and formulas then Celsius

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago

0°C getting cold outside
100°C getting hot in sauna

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never any love for Rankine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›