this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
569 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

60090 readers
3001 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Worth pointing out this isn't any proper Android TV devices, but rather those cheap boxes that are often basically SBCs with AOSP installed on them which are predominantly sold as easy piracy boxes.

Edit: in fact, the article doesn't currently have TV in the title

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Leaving out the TV makes it less precise and more clickbaity because then it sounds like Android phones are affected.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I guess the problem is that "Android TV" is a specific thing that none of these devices actually are, they're just dodgy boxes running Android that can be plugged into a TV.

For me it's more clickbaity because Android TV isn't actually involved here at all.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say it would be more clickbaity if you just removed the "TV", because it'd make you think of smartphones, and those would be much more concerning

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 year ago (11 children)
[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If I don't connect it to the internet they don't get to sell ur data innit

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm annoyed that they don't sell them and that even if you don't connect a smart tv to wifi to keep it dumb it'll still not just be a display and it'll try to shove stuff in your face

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Arfman@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago

LOL I'm still using an old CRT TV because it just won't die and I barely watch TV

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] itsraining@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (24 children)

That's why you should build your own media center from an old machine. Much safer and more private.

[–] wafflez@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 32 points 1 year ago (15 children)
  1. Connect old PC to TV. Both can be 15 years old.
  2. (optional) For better performance, get a small SSD alongside the big HDD (a 64GB / partition will do), maybe have a homemade NAS ready too
  3. Install Lubuntu, Mint XFCE, Puppy Linux or any other distro of choice
  4. Set up KDE Connect, qBittorrent and VLC
  5. Enjoy
[–] SEND_NOODLES_PLS@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cheers, I'm using this as a jump off point for a weekend project maybe. Would anything change if I was interested in casting content too?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Look into Plex servers, that should keep you busy for the next six months till you get it up and running.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 32 points 1 year ago (16 children)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danielfgom@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The problem is that YouTube app and F1 app are Android only so having a Linux media box won't help. It needs to run Android to run Android apps.

Plus I like to use Chromecast, we use it all the time to send YouTube videos from our phones to the big screen.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wait, smart devices might not be secure?! I'm shocked!

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Are non smart TVs even still a thing nowadays? I don't own or watch any TV so I honestly don't know how the market currently looks like.

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes. They are sold for commercial use, e.g., McD’s menu, and are quite pricey.

[–] thegreekgeek@midwest.social 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you meant to say not subsidized by ad tracking lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wjrii@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Depends on your definition of "quite pricey." There's no equivalent of a $250 50" Insignia FireTV, but I've seen Samsung signage displays on Amazon for about a $75-$100 premium over their comparable Smart TVs. They also don't come with a stand, so if you weren't already buying a VESA mount you'll need to add another $40-80. There is a significant premium, but it's not necessarily orders of magnitude.

[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Apparently "smartness" has not invaded projectors...per a comment I read here on kbin a while back from a projector owner. This really encourages me to buy one.

[–] Alienator@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It did though, last time I went to a tech store, there was a samsung smart projector that had all the capabilities of a smart tv

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chozo@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

They're harder to find, for sure. Especially if you want a large screen.

When I was shopping around a few years ago, the only 65" TV I could find without smart features was a Sceptre, which is Walmart's electronics brand. Speakers so bad that I had to buy a sound bar, and the display isn't that great, but it gets the job done and I don't need to worry about it being an attack vector.

[–] alignedchaos@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They get called “monitors” a lot (depending whether you need them to pick up cable/airwaves of course)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These are just generic Android TV devices that use Allwinner board. Allwinner made these kind of generic boards for Android TV and Android Auto head unit and sell them to OEMs. The OEMs then "customize" it by adding their APKs into the ROM provided by Allwinner. I doubt the malware come from Allwinner. Maybe it's just one (or more) OEM that include whatever APK they found on the internet without checking.

[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Owning a smart TV is one of the stupidest things you can do.

I'm admittedly this type of stupid, but I also know how to blacklist all the domains my garbage ass Vizio tries to phone home to.

They make the devices cheap so that they can spy on you. It's the New Deal.


Edit: I see i'm not the only one who gave up on finding a reasonable TV and just opted to neuter a Smart TV instead. Now that I'm not in a position of "me want now, nothing in local store", I think Ill take a few moments to do some research for everyone, and myself, just to highlight that there actually are still options. Heres a few brands I found that still offer Dumb TVs. I know nothing else about these, and am not in any way promoting these brands or claiming they are good at all. IDK.

This is not endorsement

If anyone has relevant info about these brands, related to if they are good or suck... let me know.

[–] Eggyhead@artemis.camp 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do modern TVs even come in non-smart variants anymore?

[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

yeah I have 3 connected to this PC

Edit, i felt bad about being a smart ass, and edited my parent comment to be more.. helpful

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (13 children)

It doesn’t really matter, just don’t connect them to the internet. Our TV just has a 14 year old computer that plays media perfectly, and is completely cut off from the internet.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's hard to buy a dumb TV now

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

new Moto G phones come to mind lol

just got one and dear lord so much adware

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spiderkle@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Linus just recently did a whole episode on a few Android TV boxes from China. Very concernig findings

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who? The guy with questionable "methodology"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 11 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

findings

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

In total the researchers confirmed eight devices with backdoors installed—seven TV boxes, the T95, T95Z, T95MAX, X88, Q9, X12PLUS, and MXQ Pro 5G, and a tablet J5-W.

The other thing discussed is fraudulent android apps that have been removed from the play store.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


This week, cybersecurity firm Human Security is revealing new details about the scope of the infected devices and the hidden, interconnected web of fraud schemes linked to the streaming boxes.

“They’re like a Swiss Army knife of doing bad things on the Internet,” says Gavin Reid, the CISO at Human Security who leads the company’s Satori Threat Intelligence and Research team.

“This is a truly distributed way of doing fraud.” Reid says the company has shared details of facilities where the devices may have been manufactured with law enforcement agencies.

In the second half of 2022, Human Security says in its report, its researchers spotted an Android app that appeared to be linked to inauthentic traffic and connected to the domain flyermobi.com.

When Milisic posted his initial findings about the T95 Android box in January, the research also pointed to the flyermobi domain.

The company’s report, which has data scientist Marion Habiby as its lead author, says Human Security spotted at least 74,000 Android devices showing signs of a Badbox infection around the world—including some in schools across the US.


The original article contains 455 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›