this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
23 points (87.1% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2204 readers
324 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A year after the world's richest man acquired the social media platform, a game plan published by a fired Trump White House staffer provides a clue.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ofk12@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's a stupid cunt with too much money. There wasn't a plan.

[–] appel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

You had me at "He's a stupid cunt"

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There isn't any. He didn't even want to buy twitter. It was only a stunt to jack up his Tesla stocks but his mouth ran faster than his lawyers.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure his burning rage about trans people and liberals in general was part of it also.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, there we go. I've thought since the start his goal was to make twitter a more useful political tool for conservatives and less effective for everyone else. And if he couldn't do that, just burn it down.

[–] appel@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll be honest, that theory didn't make sense to me, because who in their right mind would knowingly burn 44 billion dollars (and their reputation), but this article makes me reconsider.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

He'd be the perfect person to do it as he has a cult of personality, likes being controversial, is so wealthy he never would need to work or start a business again, is a committed ideologue, and could afford to lose $20 billion. I don't really think he had a solid plan, though. Musk said recently that basically he was up all night at Ellison's house (who put up $10 billion of his own - out of his net worth of $150b) and made the twitter offer. And of course, he tried to back out of it for several months.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago