yeah it's a "mistake" definitely, they just weren't thinking and did a little oopsy poopsy, nothing malicious to worry about, just a little whoopsie doodlerino
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)
New York Times gift articles
680 readers
286 users here now
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah I fucking hate this stupidity/incompetence rethoric. We're way past all that: this is all done with intentional malice. Hell, the malice is the main motivator for these people.
Well the NYT can't call fascist takeover what it is, that wouldn't be "fit to print" as their money lies in service of power.
in service of power.
"THEY GARGLE RICH NUTSACK!"
Same thing, really.
How is it a mistake? It makes tax dodging easier and reduces the ability of the IRS to run audits. Seems intentional to me.
Its like watching the fall of Rome
I'm still waiting to see a Republican Senator replaced by a horse
Sharpiegate was already analogous to Caligula declaring war on the sea.
I'd love to see the look of people's faces celebrating this when they realize they still need to pay taxes and the process is going to become much more annoying due to IRS being understaffed