this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
750 points (90.3% liked)

Games

16953 readers
376 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] darq@kbin.social 183 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gamers have gotten quite lucky so far that the company that has been in the position to turn the screws and establish a monopoly has been content to only make gobs of money, instead of trying to make all the money like pretty much every other entertainment industry.

[–] WolfhunterGer@feddit.de 173 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (22 children)

Yeah, the reason why Valve can do that is that they are not a publicly traded company but a privately owned one. Gabe Newell doesn’t have a fiduciary duty to any shareholders, so they don’t have to squeeze every penny from their users or abuse their quasi monopoly.

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The whole idea of investments always going up is an absurd idea that needs to go. At this point I infinitely prefer a private company over a publicly traded one.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 158 points 1 year ago (9 children)

People saying Steam doesn't have a monopoly because other stores exist, is the same as saying Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on PC Gaming because Mac and Linux exist. Technically true, but ultimately meaningless because its their market power that determines a monopoly, not whether there are other niche players.

While Valve and Steam have generally been a good player, and currently do offer the best product, they still wield an ungodly amount of influence over the PC gaming market space.

Epic is chasing that because they really want what Valve has, though no doubt they plan to speedrun the enshittification process as soon as they think it safe.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago (8 children)

When people say Valve doesn't have a monopoly, they usually mean they don't engage in anti-competitive practices (like making exclusivity a condition for publishing on their store, cough cough).

Actually, Valve's recent moves represent what free market capitalism should be about - when competing stores started to appear, they instead made massive contributions to Linux gaming and appealed to right-to-repair advocates with the Steam Deck. Now both of those demographics are suckling on Gaben's teats, myself included.

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 50 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Capitalism and a free economy are good when it's serving customers by making the best product or service possible, while balancing that with paying labour to make that happen.

The problem is that nowadays, there's a third party to this for the megacorps: Shareholders, which is where the enshittification begins.

Valve is a private company, so it is not beholden to any external shareholders, which is why it's been able to chart its own course. Still, I do worry what will happen when Gabe steps down.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 43 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Steam is a natural monopoly, which although still not entirely good but are a wholly different beast from monopolies made by exploiting flaws in the system

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A prerequisite for enshittification is to have a non-shit product, so Epic are actually a safe bet against enshittification.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca 114 points 1 year ago (43 children)

Is Steam really a monopoly when Valve doesn't try to stifle competition and no other company could be bothered (besides maybe GOG) to make a half decent store?

[–] hh93@lemm.ee 82 points 1 year ago (51 children)

It is a monopoly - they just don't abuse it as much against their audience.

For developers it's either take their 30% deal or just don't sell your game because a lot of people only use steam.

Not even Cyberpunk or the Witcher could sell more on gog than on steam even though you knew that there the developers got 100% of the money spent. Gwent standalone flopped so hard on GOG that it had to be rereleased with limited features on steam and sold more there

People are just fundamentally lazy so it totally is a problem that you have one store with such a massive market share even if it's very convenient for the end-user they can completely exploit their position against publishers.

Sure EPICs way of making games exclusive to their store is not elegant but without that no-one would choose that store over steam

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am not sure if it's just people being lazy. Steam legitimately is a good gaming platform. It just has so many features that really bring the PC platform to the level of consoles in terms of UX. Social features, discussion boards, reviews, matchmaking, chat, broadcasting, remote streaming, all this alongside a kickass store. That's why Valve could roll out something like Steam OS and not have it feel woefully inadequate compared to what consoles offer.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (30 children)

They are a monopoly because they.....provide the best most fair platform. Also why would linux users support ubisoft or epic.

load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (41 replies)
[–] McArthur@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (32 children)

Competition sounds great, so long as it has all of the following:

  • Something better than steam input and the steam controller.
  • Something better than steam vr.
  • Something better than steam workshop.
  • something better than proton
  • Something better than steams friends/chat/activity interface.
  • Something better than the steam overlay.
  • Something better than big picture.
  • Absolutely no exclusives, and no deals forcing developers to use it.
  • A nicer store interface than valve, with better community pages, curator pages, discussion pages, etc.
  • An equivalent to steam fest with a strong demo scene.
  • Something better than remote play together

This is of course also ignoring just how efficient, clean, customisable and ergonomic the steam interface is compared to all competition

Oh wait! That doesn't exist. All we need is some way to guarantee valve doesn't become public.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

All we need is some way to guarantee valve doesn't become public.

I am hoping for aperture science to find a immortality solution for Gabe.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 76 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's incredibly frustrating from an ideological perspective that the whole PC gaming industry runs on a benevolent dictatorship by Valve.

I mean they have near total control not just over sales, but over the gaming software installed on our PCs. They have the power to do whatever, whenever, to whoever.

But at the same time, they're cool people with good products who have good stewardship of this role.

So we uncritically give them all the power.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GabeN is getting pretty old, and he can't keep doing this forever. It'll be interesting to see where the company goes after that.

By "interesting" I mean "expecting it to be handed over to salivating, greedy idiots who don't know what made it work before".

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The day Gabe dies and pathetic bastards with business degrees take over and ruin everything that's made Steam great for all these years, is the day I begin pirating everything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

It's what happens when your competition is publicly traded cancer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] lambda@programming.dev 49 points 1 year ago (19 children)

If only they supported Linux better, or really like at all... I know you can grab the files and install without DRM. But, the whole lack of a client makes it a nuisance to use. I used to buy everything on GOG when possible. Since I got a Steam Deck that's changed. I shouldn't have to use Heroic Launcher IMO..

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] echo64@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This is literally the most popular opinion.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Dusk is an amazing game and the creator is talented as fuck but this is "I like oxygen" levels of unpopular opinion lol

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 62 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Valve may not be the cheapest by any means, but that's because they're offering a product 30x as valuable. The other launchers companies have are shit, across the board, nothing but shit. It's not even in the same continent. If any one of these companies actually wants to ever see this change, they are going to have to set their greed aside. That's impossible for CEOs in this day and age, so I don't see Steam ever losing their stranglehold unless they do an about-face from everything they've done so far. In the grand scheme of things, Valve is one of the most customer friendly companies on the face of the Earth and they continue to be innovative and supportive to users. Epic on the other hand is everything wrong with capitalism, and much the same can be said for any of the other companies with competing launchers/game stores.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

This opinion is in no way unpopular. Valve is privately owned and headed by a single individual with tremendous purpose of will, which is how they've done so many great things for the gaming industry. The issue lies with said leadership vacating their role (GabeN is getting old) and some greedy bastard taking the company in a wholy different direction. tl;dr: we need a strong competitor, but not now, and ABSOLUTELY not Epic.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'd love competition in the Linux gaming space, but none of them even attempt to support it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Steam's de-facto monopoly is so strong, Epic can't break it. Epic made four billion dollars per year on one game. Epic licenses the engine for like half of all noteworthy games. Epic has the only platform not seizing one-third of all revenue from developers, and that platform throws free shit at customers in constant desperation. And they still can't move the needle.

Monopoly doesn't mean there's zero competition. It means the competition does not matter.

PC gamers have alternatives to Steam the way that Android users have alternatives to Google Play. Yes, there are dozens. And that's how many users each one has.

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it's even possible it would take years or decades of work building up good will. It's kinda Valve's game to lose right now. They just need to not make any enormous mistakes and they win by default. Fortunately for Valve, they seem to be one of the few companies in game dev that isn't managed exclusively by misanthropes and buffoons.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (28 children)

Epic can't make a dent because their product is dogshit.

Customers don't care that Valve takes a well earned cut (that only applies buying directly from Steam); they care that their games are on a platform that's actually fucking useful. If Epic didn't insult gamers shipping that piece of trash and had put work into actually providing a product that could possibly be considered acceptable, they might have been able to make a dent.

You're not going to take market share with shitty gimmicks if your actual product is a crime against humanity no one wants.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] punseye@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

that's opposite of unpopular opinion lol

that being said, a healthy competition is still necessary as we don't know what valve would become post gabe

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dan@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (22 children)

But Steam doesn’t have a monopoly. There’s Epic and GOG and whatever Origin’s called now and probably others. They’re all free to exist, Valve doesn’t do anything to stifle competition, and even lets other companies sell games that start their launcher from Steam.

The only thing you have to lose by using a different system is that it’s probably not as good.

All they’ve done is produce a really fucking exemplary product and it’s become really popular because it’s honestly just good. The second it stops being good or Valve stop being awesome there’s plenty of alternative ways to buy games that I’m sure will be there to replace it.

But for now.. it’s pretty good.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Paranomaly@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There are so many companies that have all the pieces to make good competition to Steam but their greed gets in the way. Microsoft in particular should have been a shoe-in for it, but GFWL was an embarrassing failure, the WIndows store is rubbish and insists on a new file format that (at least in the past) caused all kinds of issues for games, and now their Game Pass service has no focus on a buying element. This is without going into both Amazon and Google tripping on the starting line when it comes to getting in the gaming space. A launcher that was tied in with Amazon's web store would be a really quick way to get a lot of people in naturally.

I really wish more people used GoG to where it could be a competitor. Unfortunately the game selection is much lower due to companies turning their noses up at no DRM. Also, I will admit that I tend to buy things on Steam in favor of GoG due to a lot of the features Steam has.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 27 points 1 year ago

I have no problem with competition, but don't force me to use your inferior product. If any of the major companies developed an actual competitor with the Steam launcher (in terms of features, not just a lousy storefront), it would likely get some use. If they somehow made it better than Steam, plenty of people would likely jump ship.

Epic is just a failure of a launcher. Nobody uses it over Steam by choice, because it's lacking in nearly every way. While I'm not big on exclusives, if the launcher was a reasonable Steam alternative, they wouldn't bother me nearly as much. As things stand, I'm firmly in the "fuck Epic" camp.

[–] nicman24@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

I d trust a privately own company with Gabe as the head than the asshats that proliferated micro transactions and shitty always online DRM for single player games.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The funny thing is that Valve kickstarted the digital sales with Half Life 2 back in 2004. Steam was an utter piece of shit for, what, some 6 years? It took them a lot of time to make it bearable, then good.

That the EGS launcher is a fucking Unreal app, needlessly bloated as fuck and with barely working UI shows their complete disregard for what is supposed to be their "money givers" (us, customers) and, like every other stupid company with their own launcher which manages to be worse than their fucking website, shows they refuse to learn the obvious.

I hope GOG never goes the enshitification path.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] z0rb@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Valve supports linux gaming! The Steam Deck is awesome and with an even better configuration (or the rumored valve's own new steam machine) this is only getting better. So, only Valve gets my money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 24 points 1 year ago (17 children)

I'm one of the few who actually like the existence of Epic. Like, not necessarily Epic itself, but some serious competition is needed. I personally would've loved it if the competition was GOG, but it seems consumers don't particularly care about ownership, so we have Epic.

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago (17 children)

The problem is that all the competition to steam is far far inferior to steam in technology and ideology and future prospects. Steam isn't a publicly traded company, has features that are pro consumers, is supporting other OS's and doesn't have a CEO that is a prick like epic.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] GenBlob@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will always support valve because of their amazing Linux support but if GOG finally made a client for Linux then I would try to use that more. I wish Epic would also support Linux but with massive douchebag Tim Sweeney running the company, that will never happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›