this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
179 points (97.4% liked)

News

24769 readers
4977 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 9 points 15 hours ago

This is getting ridiculous.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 6 points 16 hours ago

How dare they try to improve their dumpster fire of a company. Now that the elongated muskrat is in charge, hiring black people and women is illegal.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 89 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Where is his authority to tell a public business it has to do anything about its hiring practices?

Trump's EO basically just undoes anything positive, it doesn't make anything new.

The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable.

How does hiring practice have anything to do with what the FCC has power over? The government has departments for that, but it's not the FCC.

Edit Typing = hard, Typing on mobile = tears

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I try to wonder, what’s the 4D chess here?

R’s always want to dissolve these agencies, claim they overreach and abuse, and suppress their poor, unfortunate monopolies. But the mass opinion so far is hell no, we don’t want the unregulated hellscape that follows, we don’t want unchecked corpus.

So now that they can, do they order said agencies to actually overreach and abuse, so when it is offered to end it later it gets celebrated and accomplished?

Or should I give up because it’s not actually supposed to make any sense or semblance of a plan? Or is it all just a mess of distraction and unrest?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Heres the strategy "It hurts the others"

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Is it? The bottom of the totem pole might believe that and feel empowered by it, but I think the top is only concerned about themselves. I just don’t see them wasting the McCalories sparking a real thought about anything but their own gains. Sure, they don’t like us poors, but really they don’t like being told they have to treat us fairly. Or that there’s anyone above them that can say that.

As in, they don’t exactly want to gut the government purely out of desire to throw us into suffering, the suffering is just a bonus to the original goal of never ending wealth, and never being told what they can’t do.

Cut the spending, cut their taxes. Cut the public agencies, open up private revenue streams. Big G wants to say you can’t destroy your competition and become the only company people can send money to? Says you can’t bulldoze that forest? Can’t dump your waste in the river for free? Can’t have your workers working for next to nothing? Cut the agency. Cut the program. Become Gods.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump and Elon are not top. Just people that got money from their fathers greed and oppression.

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I mean Felon is pretty up there, he’s President! Note you have to think about which I may be referring to.

How they got it doesn’t much change that they do got it. And they want more, and they want anything slowing them from more or threatening to take any of it, to go away.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 1 points 23 hours ago

I mean as they are not too thinkers. Selfish and does not have a grand plan.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Announcing an investigation is like the simplest way you can pander to a group.

I could do it right now.

This way they can distract the idiots while they steal their social security, and all their identity and medical information off government servers.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They're actually playing a reverse card here and it's sorta brilliant and stupid at the same time. A lot of these lawsuits are claiming the DEI policies are illegal because they are promoting certain groups over others.

There are a number of cases popping up like this and it's probably an attempt to get it in front of the Supreme Court to kill protected classes or something - https://www.yahoo.com/news/missouri-sues-starbucks-over-dei-231002340.html

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

They are taking this approach because the supreme court killed affirmative action.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But this guy is in charge of the FCC, is he making the argument that they are breaking some broadcasting regulation by allowing non-white men in the media? If not, then he needs to look to another organization to make that case for him as staffing is not in his organization's purview.

And I understand what he is trying to do, it's the exact same racist argument they used to have the Supreme Court rollback affirmative action. It's all white supremacist arguments, just no "white genocide" in writing, just implied.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 22 hours ago

They don't care about doing things properly.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Don't disagree just sharing context and info.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Having data caps is DEI, pls remove.

anything below a gig is woke.

[–] fouloleron@lemmy.world 23 points 23 hours ago

Couldn't they just investigate them for being shit?

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The small government that doesn't want to tell people what to do

[–] tastysaganaki@reddthat.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. The truth we all know is, right wingers LOVE huge, wildly overreaching government, so long as it does whatever they want.

As long as it's working for white people. The second someone white [and hetero] is not above someone checking those boxes they have a HUGE problem with the government.

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

That's like arresting a criminal for doing something right.

Social issues aside, diversity is profitable, as it minimizes missing business opportunities due to groupthink. Therefore, even for terrible companies like Comcast, it would be financially irresponsible to not implement DEI programs.

[–] shininghero@pawb.social 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

> Has DEI
> Broke discrimination laws

The cognitive dissonance is strong here.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

It makes sense when viewed through the lense of a psychopathic white supremacist

They see trying to make white people the same as everyone else [because we are] as discrimination.

[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

I mean, fuck Comcast but this is ridiculous.

the proces are woke. the nazi way would give us gigabit for $15/month. plz fix.