this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
32 points (97.1% liked)

Wikipedia

2037 readers
150 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Balthazar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago
[–] takeheart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm leaning heavily towards hoax on this one. Surely some botanist somewhere would recognize the illustrations? Nowadays it's a hard sell that there's some secretly place somewhere that hasn't been charted botanically.

[–] a_g_dizzle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This assumes that the book is a technical manuscript so the drawings of plants are intended as technical drawings of actual plants. But this might not be the case. For all we know the book might be a work of fiction so the illustrator took creative liberties while drawing the plants.

[–] takeheart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Fair point.

[–] assa123@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Hypotheses range from a script for a natural language or constructed language, an unread code, cypher, or other form of cryptography, or perhaps a hoax, reference work (i.e. folkloric index or compendium), glossolalia[19] or work of fiction (e.g. science fantasy or mythopoeia, metafiction, speculative fiction).

[–] Isa@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago

You should've blurred the pic, since that text definitely is not safe for work!