this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
576 points (98.5% liked)

News

24749 readers
4260 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump’s move to defund USAID is causing unintended consequences for American farmers and businesses.

The Washington Post reports that USAID purchases billions in U.S. agricultural products, with American farms supplying 41% of its food aid.

The funding freeze has already halted $340 million in food shipments, leaving tons of wheat stranded in Houston.

Experts warn this decision directly harms American jobs and businesses, as much of USAID’s aid is administered through U.S.-based organizations employing American workers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 91 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I hope every farmer who voted for Trump loses their farm. Literally.

[–] Guy6758@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Seriously fuck these people its obvious what Trump is about. He did this the first time he was in office

[–] BlindFrog@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details?pubid=102979

A 2022 US dept of agriculture publication, the overview: "This report provides a detailed look at the impact of retaliatory [2018] tariffs by State and commodity and estimates the direct export losses associated with the trade conflict." Added 2018 for context

Takes two clicks to get to the summary. I can't tell what the US even won out of the war, but looks like we lost damn bigly. And are pushing the same tarrifs again 💀

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Once countries find and make deals with other suppliers they rarely return. Farmers were bailed out last time but a crashing economy is going to make it difficult this time unless the orange Jabba just prints more money again, then look for runaway inflation.

[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I think that would affect the rest of us, because that means family farms might be taken over by corporations, which is already a huge problem. Because of the downstream effects on the nation as a whole, I sincerely hope they learn their damned lesson.

Do they deserve to lose everything for their stupidity? Sure. Do the rest of us deserve to pay for their stupidity with an increasingly corporatized or weakened agricultural base? No.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Most small farms die when the next family member in line to take over doesn’t want to do it. This is personal for me because my father was a farmer and died when I was a teenager. My family now just rent out the land we own and I ended up not becoming a farmer because I don’t want to die young like he did. Farming is a stressful as hell job and it’s getting more expensive to even get into it anymore unless you got investors or inherit everything like my father did. If you don’t, then you’ll be in debt forever.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Hopefully, they lose it to agricorps, and then get pissed about being exploited, and come back on the side of the working class.

[–] Fisherman75@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I once thought it was that simple so I understand where people on here are coming from on all this. But after ten years in the San Joaquin valley, ag central, I can tell you, having grown up in Seattle and thus seeing the contrast, there is a distinct power in fundamental formal education and when that is lacking it doesn't matter what happens to them, the powers-that-be always know how gullible they are and will mold them like playdoh. I think the schools need to be funded by the central government not local governments. Big city liberals should have to put up frankly with their local neighborhood schools being taken down a few notches through evenly spreading education funds across jurisdictions if they don't want schools way out in the boondocks to be as vapid as one finds them. If you won't pay for their education my attitude is don't complain about their politics and try your best not to complain about their intelligence. I find that hard myself - I get frustrated all the time with the people in this small town, but I still try to remind myself what I've learned about education itself and I try to have compassion. Maybe that's what ten years out in the boondocks teaches a Seattleite.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 7 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Well, if they don't turn around, they become far less effectual when dirt poor, thanks to the system they created. And the poorer they are, the faster they die off.

If you won’t pay for their education my attitude is don’t complain about their politics and try your best not to complain about their intelligence.

We already do pay for their education. What do you think the Department of Ed does? Title IX funding? It comes from blue states.

I try to have compassion

I'll have compassion for them, once they stop being class traitors.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Just sit back, plan for famine, plagues and war. Find your community. Buy used, buy from locals and cut way back on vacations, eating out and travel. Grow a garden, it's like printing money. Hunt, fish, forage or get into inexpensive but useful new hobbies.
The violent right is dumb but they will finally out who is screwing them and it isn't immigrants, gays or DEI. They can't blame Democrats either because Republicans control everything now. They created this monster, let them fight him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 186 points 5 days ago (9 children)

They write these stories like this isn't the result he is looking for. The point is to crash, not rebuild; nothing the Trump administration is doing is geared to help, rebuild, or make America great. That's not how they make money. The more I see, the more I hear the more I am convinced the whole point is to destabilize and rebuild to get rid of that pesky constitution.

Maybe I am just angry or doomsaying, but I'll be damned if it doesn't look that way, and to make matters even worse, people just can't wrap their heads around the whole organized minority rules over the unorganized majority thing.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 101 points 5 days ago (6 children)

They write these stories like this isn’t the result he is looking for. The point is to crash, not rebuild;

I'm noticing a slightly different pattern with these actions. I don't think trump and his cronies were actually seeking to hurt farmers, but something else.

  1. hurt everyone temporary to see who screams.
  2. Those that scream that are opponents, continue to deny them the government benefit
  3. Those that are allies, extract concessions and/or pledges of fealty before returning the same benefit they had before.
  4. For those that don't scream, or don't scream loud enough, simply pocket the benefit for himself and his own goals.

nothing the Trump administration is doing is geared to help, rebuild, or make America great.

Agreed.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 28 points 5 days ago

Demarcating between enemies and allies (coerced or otherwise) is most definitely a primary goal.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And on the way down, connected rich people have already shorted select industries' stocks, then will buy in bigtime after the crash to profit on the long way back up.

The rich get richer.

EDIT: the way back up won't be so long, as theh recovery will be aided by big bailouts (or bail-ins) at the taxpayers' expense. So we'll get screwed not one, not two, but THREE ways.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 22 points 5 days ago

Capital leverages instability to transfer wealth to itself from the working class.

Having control over the levers of chaos means that they can not only leverage instability whenever and however they want, they are also singularly able to predict when the chaos will subside. This increases their economic power exponentially.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 days ago

That's basically what all the instability of the early 20th century was all about. On one end of the spectrum, you had communists and socialist looking at the old order and then reacting by destroying it all. On the other end of the political spectrum, you had the far right movements of the Nazis in Germany who saw the writing on the wall with the socialist wave moving in and instead wanted to create a counter movement to all the socially minded. The wealthy capitalists, millionaires, monarchs and historic aristocracy were more than willing to back the far right conservative movements who were willing to work with them than to let communists in who clearly just wanted to get rid of all the old wealthy class.

The same thing is happening all over again. Different playing field, new dynamics but still the same old ball game. Modern wealth can't work with the current system and they know things have to change so its better to back the far right than to let any kind of social democratic system take over. They'd rather destroy everything because they know that whoever is first to build whatever that remains will be the new kings and rulers of the future. Rather than accommodate and grow in any democratic system, they'd rather watch the world burn and then take over the masses who will crawl out of the ashes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 141 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Something like almost 80% of farmers voted Trump. Those leopards are eating good

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 45 points 5 days ago

Those leopards are eating good

The leopards are becoming obese now, WONT SOMEONE THINK OF THE LEOPARDS

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, we won't be in the coming months.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

They’ll stand by their vote while blaming democrats for the dei hires responsible for their farms getting shut down.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Ah yes, the Brexiters! Quite an overlap of talking points too. Minus the healthcare, there's non to speak of in US.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 71 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Almost like they don't know what the purpose of government is...

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And almost like they don't realize that large portions of the US economy is highly dependent on the US's interventionalist stance.

It's like every fucking kid learns in history class. The biggest beneficiary of the US Marshall plan was the US - the US is constantly making international decisions that drive more business to the US... those decisions usually start as deficits driving aide abroad and then form strong economic and diplomatic bonds that benefit everyone.

Trump is torpedoing the US's relationships abroad and by doing so the US economy.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 11 points 5 days ago

Britain had to fuck up and destabilize a shitload of countries to build its empire. China is being handed it's global dominance on a silver platter due to the fact that the US several other Western nations are too far up their own white supremacist libertarian assholes to actually fix shit.

I mean Milei in Argentina is such an unmitigated disaster it isn't funny, but they praise him like he is somehow uplifting the country when now 7 out of 10 Argentinian children are living in poverty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The purpose of government is to funnel taxpayer money into the hands of the rich, and to enforce laws against the poor, duh.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

The purpose of the government is to ensure nobody can say "woke" stuff, apparently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 54 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Donald Trump may have thought that defunding the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) would only hurt foreigners -- but it turns out he could actually be mistaken.

😮

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"May have thought" - that would be to strong for him. Thinking has never been his strong point. He reacts to what people around him tell him. He picks up ideas at random and turns them into executive orders.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Right, he probably only "may have thought" what Musk told him to do, which was to hurt USAID for investigating Starlink+Russia

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago (2 children)

"gambit"

Sure, let's call it that.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The famous chess move: king's gambit. Sacrifice your king for victory. Wait a minute . . .

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 days ago

Everyone knows international aid is to support local economies

I don’t think anything is backfiring

[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Farmers are going to get hammered with retaliatory tariffs on exports too. Time for them to find out I guess.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 36 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Well, it's what they voted for in their blind hatred of everything that made America great.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The Washington Post reports that USAID purchases billions in U.S. agricultural products, with American farms supplying 41% of its food aid.

I did not know this myself.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Basically all of foreign "giving" by America is done by purchasing American goods and giving them in exchange for goodwill, soft power, regional stability, favorable trade deals, or other political capital.

Many Americans don't understand any of that and think their tax money is going in the form of a check to people who don't care and don't give us anything in exchange. And it's not like this is a secret, it's just kinda gauche for the government to explicitly state it

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

That's the thing about how headlines mislead. When they say, "US sends $x in aide or weapons," what they really mean is that the US is subsidizing an American lobby group. Not to say that is bad thing, just that it gives the wrong impression.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Mate, the orange halfwit has just flooded a huge number of farms in California. They're still gonna vote for him.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 19 points 5 days ago

I don't know if him opening the dams flooded any farms, but come summertime, they're going to be hurting as the reservoirs empty out long before they should have.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, if they vote for Democrats, they might turn gay or woke.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 5 days ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Seriously, only people permanently stuck in adolescence with bullshit Libertarian notions about government believe that you can BREAK government and things will turn out well.

Only a dumbfuck Randroid type (or maybe the random leftist veering on wrapping all the way around the horseshoe) thinks that burning it all down is going to lead to better things...it's easy if you are totally ignorant to think that "government doesn't do anything for ME" as an actual thing you believe.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 36 points 5 days ago (2 children)

... "government doesn't do anything for ME" as an actual thing you believe.

This happens because people take completely for granted all of the things government quietly does for them.

It's kind of the same as "Why do we even have an IT department? Everything works, what are they even doing?"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Trump: "If food prices are so high, what if we just... keep all the food here? That will bring them down, right?"

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Dustbowl 2025, fuck yeah! Bringing back the classics!

(Farmers won't or can't spend money to plant -> too many fallow fields -> giant walls of airborne topsoil)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kompressor@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Surely they’ll still buy those goods and give them to Americans. They aren’t just dissolving programs and making money disappear, couldn’t be.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I had some nutjob on a local group tell me that Trump has removed federal taxes as if I and everyone else can't clearly see that we're still paying the same federal taxes on my paystubs. I can't believe how brainwashed some people have become.

Also tangentially related but I filled out my tax return today and owe a lot more this year thanks to his bullshit 2018 tax bill that capped SALT deductions, removed the child tax credit, and only gave temporary cuts to people who aren't in the 1%. I can only imagine that his supporters are either retired, unemployed, or on social security to also not realize how much more he's forcing us to pay to the government.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

Yeah, they couldn't possibly be cruel or incompetent, not them!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›