I mean, that's how I would think about it...
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
298 points (82.7% liked)
Technology
61774 readers
4267 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why?
The typo in "strawbery" leads to a conversation like "hey you spelt this wrong there's two r's (after the e) not one"
Huh. It's just simply a wrong answer though.
It happens even if you ask how many “r”s are in “strawberry”. It’s a well-known AI gotcha that happens on most if not all current models. The typo in the original post is a little misleading and not that relevant.
I can already see it...
Ad: CAN YOU SOLVE THIS IMPOSSIBLE RIDDLE THAT AI CAN'T SOLVE?!
With OP's image. And then it will have the following once you solve it: "congratz, send us your personal details and you'll be added to the hall of fame at CERN Headquarters"
I know right? It's not a fruit it's a vegetable!
From a linguistic perspective, this is why I am impressed by (or at least, astonished by) LLMs!
The terrifying thing is everyone criticising the LLM as being poor, however it excelled at the task.
The question asked was how many R in strawbery and it answered. 2.
It also detected the typo and offered the correct spelling.
What’s the issue I’m missing?
Uh oh, you’ve blown your cover, robot sir.
There's also a "r" in the first half of the word, "straw", so it was completely skipping over that r and just focusing on the r's in the word "berry"
It wasn't focusing on anything. It was generating text per its training data. There's no logical thought process whatsoever.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)