this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
859 points (99.0% liked)

science

15650 readers
709 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stormdancer@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago

What the actual fuck?! It's like living in a fever-driven nightmare. We can only hope there are backups of the un-purged documents.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Well now how will I explain that a pregnant dominant species member is not a Martian

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 28 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is pretty dumb even by trump standards. You would think the right of all people would know that trying to ban terms will just result in new euphemisms and jargon being created.

Most of the research caught up is probably going to be using the terms incidentally (for instance, a drug study that happens to mention participants were AMAB) and this will cause a bunch of paperwork and probably just end up being changed to something like "gametically" or "chromosomally".

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Think even more general than that. Ignore identity/gender/sexuality issues for a moment. How do you write a research article about the negative effects of a drug on pregnancy without using the word pregnant? About complications during a "normal pregnancy"(I'm using their word, not mine - please don't take offense - I hope you see where I'm going)? If you can't mention gender or pregnancy, even when it's about cis people, you suddenly can't do a whole hell of a lot of research.

[–] Kryptenx@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Oh you can say pregnant woman. Just not pregnant person.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 days ago

You would think the right of all people would know that trying to ban terms will just result in new euphemisms and jargon being created.

The right thinks that if they clamp down hard enough that it will just go away, much like LGBTQ people were forced to mask and hide themselves like they had to back in the day, otherwise they ended up like Matthew Shepard. I don't know that they even consider the euphemism treadmill aspect of things, they just don't want these people to feel like they can be themselves and feel safe.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The CDC has instructed its scientists to retract or pause the publication of any research manuscript being considered by any medical or scientific journal, not merely its own internal periodicals

The scope is thankfully limited only to CDC scientists.

Not that this makes it good news by any stretch.

This is going to push research money squarely under the thumb of corporate control, which is of course the aim here. Privatize everything.

I do know scientists hate having their work paywalled or censored so I’d expect sci-hub to get a lot more popular real quick, but many will definitely self censor their official publications to keep their jobs til orange hitler shoots himself in a bunker somewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago

Following the manual to the letter

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago

This must be all that government waste I've been hearing about...

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 28 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I hope no one resubmits anything.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 24 points 5 days ago

I think the endgame is to tear down anything tax dollars have touched. Which, you know, is plausible since his entire platform could be simply summed up as a giant middle finger.

Expect them to attempt to torch more than our science databases

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

Truth always is the first victim.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How long until this evil administration forces some citizens to sew a yellow star or pink triangle on their clothes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

The GOP read the Bolshevik, CCP and Nazi playbooks.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Are you fucking kidding me?!?! What the fuck is wrong with that orange fucking clown? Jesus fuckjng christ.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›