this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
598 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19536 readers
5010 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

A constitutional amendment required 2/3s House and Senate AND 3/4 of states. And they don’t have that. This is more bullshit to distract.

To amend the U.S. Constitution, a proposed amendment must be approved by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and then ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 out of 50 states). Alternatively, an amendment can be proposed by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures, but this method has never been used.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is more bullshit to distract.

This is saying it louder for the people in the back. Musk's Nazi Salute isn't getting the message across? Okay, how about this?

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They so desperatly want a hidden militia to come out of the woodwork and coup the country for them

Those people are either dead from covid, too old to fight for their coup, or are just LARPers and actually aren't interested in dying for a con man.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

well a shit ton were just released from jail after being paroled for j6

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wonderful idea, I can't wait for a third Obama term.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

It's written specifically to exclude Bush, Clinton, and Obama, Trump is the only person it can apply to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

The neo-Nazi filled GOP can shove their 3rd term idea where the sun does not shine.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago

“It is imperative that we provide President Trump with every resource necessary to correct the disastrous course set by the Biden administration,” Ogles said in a statement

so Biden created a bad situation for him in 4 years, yet he thinks Trump needs 8 years to undo it. Sounds like a skill issue to me.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 79 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Good job guys, you saved Palestine!

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] blackberry@midwest.social 23 points 1 day ago (5 children)

'No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms," the amendment states. Former Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama all served two consecutive terms, and thus would be barred from being elected to a third term. But not Trump, who is the first president since Grover Cleveland in 1892 to be elected to a second, non-consecutive term.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 128 points 1 day ago (13 children)

It's cute how so many in the comments think the legal checks will prevent this. They don't care about the law or the Constitution in the same way they don't care about optics, hypocrisy, decorum, or process. People keep viewing this through the lense of American democracy. None of that matters to fascists.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 day ago

Yeah, people don't seem to truly understand this, and I fear it will take something extreme before they do... And it's likely already too late now, let alone by then.

[–] timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They care about the law the same way the nazi's cared about the law until the night of the long knives. I suspect their mass deportation plan is really them gearing up for the night of the long knives 2.0.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Obama returns to the presidency in 2028!

[–] blackberry@midwest.social 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

''No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms," the amendment states. Former Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama all served two consecutive terms, and thus would be barred from being elected to a third term. But not Trump, who is the first president since Grover Cleveland in 1892 to be elected to a second, non-consecutive term.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't really matter. Getting a new constitutional amendment ratified is basically impossible at this point.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

bet they try to take it to the supreme court "whaaa the congress won't give me a dictatorship whaaa" and the court just fucks us all.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Pretty cool how we have the freedumb to install a dictator.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Just First Past the Post voting things.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Metz@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Didn't even wait a whole week. Emporer Trump inbound

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So where them 2A folk at LOL

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why aren't the "left" arming themselves while an obvious fascist takes power? "LOL"

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We aren’t loud about it, but many of us are always armed and many more are getting there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 215 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s impressive how hard these people lick boots.

[–] gazby@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But also how shameless they are, doing it in full public view

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 85 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In order for it to pass, they need 290 votes in the House. The Republicans currently have 220 votes, so they would need 70 Democrats to flip.

Then it goes to the Senate where they need 67 votes. First, 60 to get past the inevitable filibuster, and with 53 votes, Republicans need 7 Democrats to flip to move it forward and 14 to pass it.

Then, the fun part, they need 38 states to ratify it. Trump did win 31 states, so he would still need 7 Harris states to ratify an amendment.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 83 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Nah. They're just gonna say "whachu gonna do about it" as he sits in the office for the third time. Or the richest men in the world backing the regime will just ~~bri~~ lobby.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Knowing Trump, I wouldn't be surprised if he went full Nayib Bukele and sent in troops to influence the vote.

And as much as I like Bukele, he presided over unique circumstances where his country was effectively being ruled by MS-13 and his actions were warranted in the case of being elected leader of a country ruled by drug overlords. The USA is going through no such crisis.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 67 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Me as a Tennessean: "I bet it's Andy Ogles"

Checks

Goddamn can I read that man like a fucking book. I'm sorry we're all trying to vote the bastard out but the State gerrymandered the district because... AND I SHIT YOU NOT... "California does it, so it's okay if we do it too". Honest to God what our State Assembly said about breaking Nashville up into a hellscape of gerrymandering.

Do know, he's an idiot IRL as well. He's the kind that's really full of himself and he's got a super high self-worth in head.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 131 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Good fucking luck with that hurdle.

They need a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate; or a conventio called by Congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. Then it has to be ratified by the legislatures of three-quarters of the states.

Even if they managed a super majority on both sides of Congress for Trumplefuck, there's no way they're getting 38 States to agree to that.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 113 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't think the law is a restricting factor for the trump regime.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 73 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

It's sad that you guys still think the rule of the constitution is some massive roadblock that they've somehow missed. They literally made an Executive Order that just says "No" to the very first sentence of the 14th amendment, do you think none of them noticed? They get to have a vote about ludicrous things, and they get to gleefully destroy the lives of any Republican who dares vote against them. Maybe it gets struck down for the time being? Who cares, the courts are packed, they can realistically just start killing people pretty soon and it'll start with the disloyals and the true believers as needed as it always does.

You cannot logical trap nor get off on technicalities fascists. It does not matter to them, they will just do what they want anyways, all that matters is if they can crush anyone who tries to stop them.

They are pushing the boundaries of the conversation and they are testing the waters, and every time they're pushed back on they use the limp push back to consolidate more power because nobody has been willing to actually stop them.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

With all due respect, that is some real defeatist dog shit. Yes, Trump and cronies have no respect for the constitution or the rule of law. But if we collectively roll over at the first fascist executive order, that's exactly what they want us to do.. They are testing the waters. The supreme court is packed, but every circuit court in the country certainly isn't. And that's where these battles are already being fought. We need to collectively resist every encroachment, every power grab. Otherwise we're nearly as culpable as Trump for the rise of fascism.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›