this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
612 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

60806 readers
4650 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR if you don't wanna watch the whole thing: Benaminute (the Youtuber here) creates a fresh YouTube account and watches all recommended shorts without skipping. They repeat this 5 times, where they change their location to a random city in the US.

Below is the number of shorts after which alt-right content was recommended. Left wing/liberal content was never recommended first.

  1. Houston: 88 shorts
  2. Chicago: 98 shorts
  3. Atlanta: 109 shorts
  4. NYC: 247 shorts
  5. San Fransisco: never (Benaminute stopped after 250 shorts)

There however, was a certain pattern to this. First, non-political shorts were recommended. After that, AI Jesus shorts started to be recommended (with either AI Jesus talking to you, or an AI narrator narrating verses from the Bible). After this, non-political shorts by alt-right personalities (Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, Ben Shapiro, etc.) started to be recommended. Finally, explicitly alt-right shorts started to be recommended.

What I personally found both disturbing and kinda hilarious was in the case of Chicago. The non-political content in the beginning was a lot of Gen Alpha brainrot. Benaminute said that this seemed to be the norm for Chicago, as they had observed this in another similar experiment (which dealt with long-form content instead of shorts). After some shorts, there came a short where AI Gru (the main character from Despicable Me) was telling you to vote for Trump. He was going on about how voting for "Kamilia" would lose you "10000 rizz", and how voting for Trump would get you "1 million rizz".

In the end, Benaminute along with Miniminuteman propose a hypothesis trying to explain this phenomenon. They propose that alt-right content might be inciting more emotion, thus ranking high up in the algorithm. They say the algorithm isn't necessarily left wing or right wing, but that alt-right wingers have understood the methodology of how to capture and grow their audience better.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

From my anecdotal experiences, it's "manly" videos that seem to lead directly to right wing nonsense.

Watch something about how a trebuchet is the superior siege machine, and the next video recommended is like "how DEI DESTROYED Dragon Age Veilguard!"

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

Or "how to make ANY woman OBEY you!"

Check out a short about knife sharpening or just some cringe shit and you're all polluted.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

I bet thise right wing shorts are proposed and shoehorned in everywhere because someone pays for the visibility. Simple as that.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 35 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I keep getting recommendations for content like "this woke person got DESTROYED by logic" on YouTube. Even though I click "not interested", and even "don't recommend channel", I keep getting the same channel, AND video recommendation(s). It's pretty obvious bullshit.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

You'd think a recommendation algorithm should take your preferences into account - that's the whole justification for tracking your usage in the first place: recommending relevant content for you...

[–] AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 2 points 43 minutes ago

recommending relevant content for you

The aim is not to recommend relevant content. The aim is to recommend content you will engage with. That may be because you're interested, or it may be because it's ragebait that you will hate but watch anyway.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

YOU'D THINK THAT YES. [caps intended]

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

it is. But who said that **you ** get to decide what's relevant for you? Welcome and learn to trust your algorithmic overlords

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 hours ago

Thanks, I hate it

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Anything but the subscriptions page is absolute garbage on that site. Ideally get an app to track your subs without having to have an account. NewPipe, FreeTube etc.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Are those available on PC/Linux? On my TV? 😭 I have them on my phone but I feel like there's too much hassle to do on my main viewing devices.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 31 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I hate the double standards

On a true crime video: "This PDF-File game ended himself after he was caught SAing this individual.... Sorry Youtube forces me to talk like that or I might get demonetized" Flagged for discussing Suicide

On PragerU: "The Transgender Agenda is full of rapists and freaks who will sexually assault your children, they are pedophiles who must be dealt with via final solution!" Completely fucking acceptable!

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Be nice to Prager, he's very fragile https://youtu.be/YpIQPv5Iq4Y

[–] GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

The view farming in shorts makes it even harder to avoid as well. Sure, I can block the JRE channel, for example, but that doesn’t stop me from getting JRE clips from probably day-old accounts which just have some shitty music thrown on top. If you can somehow block those channels, there’s new ones the next day, ad infinitum.

It’s too bad you can’t just disable the tab entirely, I feel like I get sucked in more than I should. I’ve tried browser extensions on mobile which remove the tab, but I haven’t had much luck with PiPing videos from the mobile website, so I can’t fully stop the app.

[–] ravva@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

There is nothing I click with more alacrity and regularity than the "hide Shorts button."

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

If they are using a vpn to switch their location, could it be that people in the south are using the same ip to access phub and rightwing crap?

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Filter bubbles are the strongest form of propaganda.

[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

does shadow-banning create filter bubbles, in a way it demonstrates the power these platforms hold over their users? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_ban

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Commenting on stuff definitely strengthens it, but I wouldn't know if a shadow ban changes that. I don't think there's much difference if you are shadowbanned or not, you're still interacting with the content.

[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

In my view, instagram blocking Searchterm democrat for short times is kind of a shadowban … on all democrats

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago

That's not what a shadowban is. A shadow ban is where the user does not know they are banned. These search terms were very obviously censorship and not a shadowban.

If it were a shadowban then you would still get results and be able to interact with it. But some results might have been hidden and your interactions would be hidden to others too. A shadowban is meant to make you believe you were not censored.

[–] Subtracty@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

With Milo (miniminuteman) in the thumbnail, I thought the video was going to imsinuate that his content was part of the alt-right stuff. Was confused and terrified. Happily, that was not the case.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So....... in the US then ?

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

It's 100% not just the US where the algorithm favours this stuff.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

Saying it disproportionately promotes any type of content is hard to prove without first establishing how much of the whole is made up by that type.

The existence of proportionately more "right" leaning content than "left" leaning content could adequately explain the outcomes.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Do these companies put their fingers on the scale? Almost certainly

But it’s exactly what he said that’s what brought us here. They have not particularly given a shit about politics (aside from no taxes and let me do whatever I want all the time). However, the algorithms will consistently reward engagement. Engagement doesn’t care about “good” or “bad”, it just cares about eyes on it, clicks, comments. And who wins that? Controversial bullshit. Joe Rogan getting elon to smoke weed. Someone talking about trans people playing sports. Etc

This is a natural extension of human behavior. Human behavior occurs because of a function. I do x because of a function, function being achieving reinforcement. Attention, access to something, escaping, or automatic.

Attention maintained behaviors are tricky because people are shitty at removing attention and attention is a powerful reinforcer. You tell everyone involved “this person feeds off of your attention, ignore them”. Everyone agrees. The problematic person pulls their bullshit and then someone goes “stop it”. They call it negative reinforcement (this is not negative reinforcement. it’s probably positive reinforcement. It’s maybe positive punishment, arguably, because it’s questionable how aversive it is).

You get people to finally shut up and they still make eye contact, or non verbal gestures, or whatever. Attention is attention is attention. The problematic person continues to be reinforced and the behavior stays. You finally get everyone to truly ignore it and then someone new enters the mix who doesn’t get what’s going on.

This is the complexity behind all of this. This is the complexity behind “don’t feed the trolls”. You can teach every single person on Lemmy or reddit or whoever to simply block a malicious user but tomorrow a dozen or more new and naive people will register who will fuck it all up

The complexity behind the algorithms is similar. The algorithms aren’t people but they work in a similar way. If bad behavior is given attention the content is weighted and given more importance. The more we, as a society, can’t resist commenting, clicking, and sharing trump, rogan, peterson, transphobic, misogynist, racist, homophobic, etc content the more the algorithms will weight this as “meaningful”

This of course doesn’t mean these companies are without fault. This is where content moderation comes into play. This is where the many studies that found social media lead to higher irritability, more passive aggressive behavior and lower empathetization could potentially have led us to regulate these monsters to do something to protect their users against the negative effects of their products

If we survive and move forward in 100 years social media will likely be seen in the way we look at tobacco now. An absolutely dangerous thing that was absurd to allowed to exist in a completely unregulated state with 0 transparency as to its inner workings

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 146 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I think the explanation might be even simpler - right wing content is the lowest common denominator, and mindlessly watching every recommended short drives you downward in quality.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 26 minutes ago)

yeah i created a new youtube account in a container once and just watched all the popular/drama suggestions. that account turned into a shitstorm immediately

these days i curate my youtube accounts making liberal use of Not interested/Do not recommend channel/Editing my history and even test watching in a container before watching it on my curated account

this is just how "the algorithm" works. shovel more of what you watch in your face.

the fact that they initially will give you right-wing, conspiracy fueled, populist, trash right off the bat is the concern

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 45 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I was gonna say this. There’s very little liberal or left leaning media being made and what there is is mostly made for a female or LGBTQ audience. Not saying that men cannot watch those but there’s not a lot of “testosterone” infused content with a liberal leaning, one of the reasons Trump won was this, so by sheer volume you’re bound to see more right leaning content. Especially if you are a cisgender male.

Been considering creating content myself to at least stem the tide a little.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 22 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think some of it is liberal media is more artsy and creative, which is more difficult to just pump out. Creation if a lot more difficult than destruction.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] credo@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I refuse to watch those shit shorts; I think your theory has legs. Unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be a way to turn them off.

[–] kinship@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

FreeTube on PC and Revanced on phone

[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I use YouTube revanced to disable them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 hours ago

This is basically the central thesis of The Social Dilemma.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

I'll get downvoted for this, with no explanation, because it's happened here and on reddit.

I'm a liberal gun nut. Most of my limited YouTube is watching gun related news and such. You would think I'd be overrun with right-wing bullshit, but I am not. I have no idea why this is. Can anyone explain? Maybe because I stick to the non-politcal, mainstream guntubers?

The only thing I've seen start to push me to the right was watching survival videos. Not some, "dems gonna kill us all" bullshit, simply normal, factual stuff about how to survive without society. That got weird fast.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

I've noticed most firearms channels steer well clear of politics, unless it's directly related to the topic at hand, I think partly to appeal to an international audience.

I do think the algorithm puts firearms and politics into very separate categories, someone watching Forgotten Weapons probably isn't going to be interested in political content.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 5 hours ago

Their algorithms are probably good enough to know you're interested in guns but not right wing stuff. Simple as that.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world 43 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Instagram is probably notably worse, I have a very establish account that should be very anti that sort of thing and it keeps serving up idiotic guru garbage.

Tiktok is by far the best in this aspect, at least before recent weeks.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›