this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
19 points (88.0% liked)

Games

16745 readers
716 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Since its release in 2020, the Xbox Series S has been the subject of debate over its value within the current hardware generation lineup due to being less powerful than the Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5. It turns out, Microsoft's $300 Series S is more popular than the Series X.

The revelation was spotted in the big Xbox court document leak that has taken the internet by storm this week. One of these documents focuses on Xbox's April 2022 gaming results. While the document is heavily redacted, one slide shows the "Console Sell-In Mix". As you can see in the screenshot below, the document reveals that 74.8% of Xbox Series owners own the Series S, with the Series X on 25.1%. As mentioned, these numbers are from early 2022, so may have changed since then.

While this split seems surprising at first glance given the lower power of the Xbox Series S (it's designed to normally render games at 1440p resolution and 60 frames per second, with a lack of 4K gaming and no disc drive), it should not be entirely surprising from a consumer perspective.

The Xbox Series S is the most affordable console out of the three home systems available in the ninth generation of gaming. Costing $299 (or $349.99 if you buy the 1TB model), the S is a console capable of playing next-gen games like Starfield, even if not at the highest graphical settings. It's an appealing pitch to most people who care more about the games and less about peak performance.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is anyone surprised? I thought it was common knowledge that the S outsold the X by a pretty sizable margin?

[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The lower price, mixed with the fact that there was a very long stretch of time that you could get a series x probably contributed to that as well.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know I only got it because I couldn't get an SX and it's my secondary console. I kinda regretted it, but it really doesn't get a lot of use. And probably won't until Fable comes out.

[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm enjoying it. I don't have a TV that can take advantage of the X's power, and I honestly don't care about super high frame rate for ultra high quality graphics. Almost all the games I play are on Gamepass too, so not having a disc drive doesn't bother me.

Plus it was given to me for free when a family member replaced it with an X.

[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Microsoft pushing it as the affordable next-gen console didn't hurt. I'm not sure how that decision will play out going forward for Microsoft, but it's been a pretty effective strategy so far.

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

The only mistake imo Microsoft made with the S was not giving it the same ram as the x. Puts more work on devs to optimize vram assets when vram is the cheapest way to make any game look better to a dev.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I got a PS5 because it was either that or S in terms of availability, and at the time people only had guesses as to when the X would be available.

[–] gringo_papi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's so cheap. Paired with Gamepass, it's the obvious answer for super casual gamers.