this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1536 readers
198 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this.)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Yud is against seed oils, right? Or was that Siskind? I have a vague memory of the topic coming up but was unable to substantiate it in the 22 seconds of archive-searching that I was willing to do.

[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Its Yud I think. As someone from Canola-land this shit really grinds my gears.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

Just want to share this great term & definition "hyperkludge" coined by Jonathan Korman (@miniver on bsky and masto)

hyperkludge: a design which is not a good solution for much of anything, but is a tolerably bad solution for so many things that it proliferates until network effects help it beat out better designs

https://miniver.blogspot.com/2023/01/hyperkludge-n.html

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Counterpoint: to what extent are hyperkludges actually a unique thing versus an aspect of how technologies and tools are integrated into human context? Like, one of the original examples is the TCP/IP stack, but as anyone who has had to wrangle multiple vendors can attest a lot of the value in that standardization necessarily comes from the network effects - the fact that it's an accepted standard. The web couldn't function if you had a bespoke protocol stack hand-made to elegantly handle the specific problems of a given application not just because of the difficulty in building that much software (i.e. network effects on the design and construction side) but because of how unwieldy and impractical it would be to get any of those applications in front of people. The fit of those tools for a given application is secondary to how much more cleanly the entire ecosystem can operate because they are more limited in number.

The OP also talks about how embedded the history of a given problem is in the solution which feels like the central explanation for this trend. In that sense a hyperkludge isn't a unique pattern that some things fall into and more a way of indicating a particularly noteworthy whorl in the fractal infinikludge that is all human endeavors.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Examples off the top of my head:

  • Almost everything about TCP/IP stack
  • NETCONF
  • YAML
  • Most things related to cars and car infrastructure
  • Alcohol
  • Chiclet keyboards
  • Unicode Han unification
  • Layer 2 SDN
  • Kubernetes
  • JavaScript
  • Disk partitioning
  • UEFI
  • Public transit fares

Edit: checked the link and was surprised our lists didn't have any ones in common (though I considered including MS Excel).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mlen@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm surprised that alphabetical lists are included. Maybe my brain has completely rotten, but keeping the data sorted is pretty neat for efficient processing

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 7 points 3 days ago

yeah that is an interesting example. I immediately applied the term to commercial products. Like Notion for example - funny because I always say Notion takes wikis which are well established in their usefulness and just slaps them into saas product with other things like docs and spreadsheets (also well established in their usefulness) - but he calls wikis themselves a hyperkludge but what superior thing did wikis kill by network effects?

[–] khalid_salad@awful.systems 6 points 3 days ago

this rules <3

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 3 days ago

oh that's pretty great

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] khalid_salad@awful.systems 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Does anyone else get tired of "read documentation and edit this text file to configure your app" Unix shit? I have no problem with the underlying configuration being a text-file (makes for a straightforward API), but do I really need to navigate to https://mpv.io/manual/master/#configuration-files and go through the rigamarole of figuring out which options I need to edit/include^[0]^ because I misplaced (read: sudo rm -rf /) my config file?


[0]: And there is always so much implicit bullshit. "By default, we summon Cthulhu on Tuesdays and Thursdays if the variable summon_octopus_guy is unset." It's a fucking config file, my friends, can we just be explicit?

[–] nightsky@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago

Oh yeah. I recently wanted to configure something in pipewire... the idea was simple: just creating a boot-persistent audio loopback, i.e. connecting an audio input to an output. I gave up for now after looking at the config examples for that in the documentation. How can such a simple thing need such complex configuration?

As for losing configs, I've started to put all my hand-edited config files in a git repo on my NAS so at least I only have to figure out things once.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Surely it's better to specify those defaults in the config file and have the system just fail if the necessary flags aren't present. Having worked in support I can vouch for the amount of suffering that could be avoided if more systems actually failed if some important configuration isn't in place.

[–] khalid_salad@awful.systems 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Surely it’s better to specify those defaults in the config file and have the system just fail if the necessary flags aren’t present.

Completely agree. I think this may just be an extension of the "you gotta know what you're doing to code correctly in C" old school bullshit.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is my biggest gripe with that nonsense. If you make it hard to do something well, you won't end up with an elite series of uber-coders because there aren't enough of those people to do all the programming that people want to be done. Instead you'll see that much more software engineering done really goddamned badly and despite appearances at the time it turns out there is a maximum amount of shitty software the world can endure.

[–] khalid_salad@awful.systems 6 points 3 days ago

What's great is even the very best "just use valgrind lol, lmao" folks make these errors all the time. It's basically impossible to write correct C code generally


the best we can do is verify subsets of code (c.f. Rust's unsafe keyword). The memory-safety CVEs in EXT3/4 are proof of this, IMO, as if there were anyone able to write correct C code today, it would be Ted Ts'o.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Personally I think it's fine to have implicit defaults if you can make them sensible. Maybe ideally have a system-wide config like /etc/someapp.conf with all the options included and set to defaults out of the box and then allow overrides in ~/.config/someapp/someapp.conf where you only need to specify whatever you want to differ from the system conf file.

[–] khalid_salad@awful.systems 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I personally disagree. I think in the era of "a megabyte is big," this made sense, but in my opinion after parsing a config file with missing config data, we should print something indicating they are missing then error out. The existence of a reference config file with all options included would definitely help, but I think it's no coincidence that there is no such config for mpv


why bother creating and maintaining one if the program will use the default value anyway?

tl;dr explicit is better than implicit

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I dunno, MPV has like a million config options and I've set like three of them in my config. I would not prefer to maintain an enormous config file where I need to include a bajillion options I don't care about just to play a video. Would I have to update my config every single time MPV adds, removes or renames an option, too?

[–] khalid_salad@awful.systems 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

At the end of the day you shouldn't have to maintain anything in order to use a program, in my opinion (at least ideally). I think a "everything must be present in the file" type of config would require ~~less~~ no extra maintenance (assuming devs don't do anything too silly). Additionally, while noting that my primary programming language is TeX and also that I am a dipshit, this just strikes me as an API-design problem. Alternative solutions could be:

  1. multiple config files (I think mpv already supports this)
  2. semver style config (idk if this would be practical)
  3. a config-editing tool (i.e., what the overwhelming majority of applications do, by hiding the implementation details from the user)

I have thought about doing #3 for Sway (a sort of Sway-config editor). This does give me an idea, though: define a meta-format for specifying the variables, default values, allowed values, etc., for an arbitrary^[0]^ program's config file, and create a program that reads a meta-format file and presents a GUI for editing the config.

tbh i just lost my config file, forgot what i changed, and now i have to read documentation (and figure out which file the mpv flatpak uses for config)


[0]: maybe not too arbitrary

[–] self@awful.systems 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

define a meta-format for specifying the variables, default values, allowed values, etc., for an arbitrary[0] program’s config file, and create a program that reads a meta-format file and presents a GUI for editing the config.

I’d kinda love this even if I’m editing config files in a text editor. emacs could use this with a major-mode or LSP to provide suggestions, validity checking, various rendered versions of the config, and guarantee interoperability with graphical tools (so that changes you make in an editor don’t get trampled by the UI, and vice versa)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

25475 O Jan 08 Duke University ( 42K) Help Us Evaluate New Personalized AI Learning Tool

groan

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 days ago

put an article in mdpi and you'll get 70 of these per month

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Zuck wants to get back to his roots

It's time to get back to our roots around free expression and giving people voice on our platforms. Here's what we're going to do: [...] 5/ Move our trust and safety and content moderation teams out of California, and our US content review to Texas. This will help remove the concern that biased employees are overly censoring content.

Narrator: this announcement did not, in fact, ease concerns about bias.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah i recall somebody got mad when I mentioned traditionally capitalists will team up with fascists.

[–] nightsky@awful.systems 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Maybe I was naive, but I didn't expect all this to go that fast and that blatant...

[–] mirrorwitch@awful.systems 10 points 3 days ago (6 children)

No, I'm with you. Bad feeling about where this is going.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mlen@awful.systems 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Is that a comedy account? The announcement surely reads as if it was…

To add an insult to the injury meta renames pride themed skins in chat https://labyrinth.zone/objects/e129982d-997e-489b-985a-3ef547b66bf3

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not. Surprise! All of Silicon Valley has gone mask off in preparation for the new administration in Washington!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Fascist virtue signalling aside, candy floss should not exist. That's like the exact opposite of dental care.

Edit: I have been made aware that Candy Floss is another name for cotton candy, which is delicious. Though my point kind of still stands.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

For a fun 20 minutes or so, I recommend going through the recent enron “revival”. (It’s all satire)

[–] self@awful.systems 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

the worst Nix project has finally been announced: behold crypto NixOS

I’m starting a paradigm shifting, open and new human / computer interface system that is global, multi device and privacy focused.

[…]

DISCLAIMER: You are not my exit liquidity, I have the best performing long term spot crypto portfolio in the world - I’m a early adopter with 100% hit rate on geniuses. So, I don’t have to work, I’m not building this to become rich. I want to build something paradigm changing - truly mind-blowing, because now we have the tech and I’m annoyed how computer work. It is a lot of work, but it will reward us all.

my “this isn’t a grift and I’m not a grifter” disclaimer is prompting a lot of questions already answered by the disclaimer. but speaking of prompting, what goes with crypto?

ChatGPT-1o thinks, after some reinforced asking, that the MC of such a coin can reach 300-1000M; I think it could easily go higher - it solves so fundamental problems in a much more elegant way. In my opinion, it will be the same step as the command line to the windowed systems was. Or dump phone to smart phone. It will just span devices and span users while keeping the data under control and of companies.

of course. after some reinforced asking, gpt told me you’re all haters if you don’t think I’m as important as Xerox PARC!

there’s lots more in the OP to sneer at, but here’s the worst part of the thread:

Mod note: I’m glad to see doubt and scepticism about crypto-based claims. However, that point has now been made; please avoid any further posts in that vein to avoid a pile-on dunkfest, and leave the thread for any potential on-topic discussion.

thanks for nothing as usual NixOS discourse!

e: via mastodon, archive

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 10 points 4 days ago

i forced chatgpt to say that my idea will make you a billion dollars but i think it can go higher

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

after some reinforced asking

Shit chatgpt is self aware, it did the 'if I agree with you will you shut the fuck up' thing.

E: while I shouldn't speak on that subject, weird typos.

[–] nightsky@awful.systems 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Must be rich indeed, the disclaimer is pure gold.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›