this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
303 points (95.5% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2357 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They dont. The US isn't a democracy, its a plutocracys.

Stop parroting the oligarchs that punch down. Blame the oppressors.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Both are true.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's not that complicated. The number of people who are in support of Luigi's actions aren't a majority:

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/17/united-healthcare-ceo-killing-poll

About 17% overall. There's stark differences between age groups, but none have a majority. Even if the poll is off by 10 points (which would be an egregiously large polling error), only a small but vocal minority are in support.

[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1bLmjKzZ43eLIxZb1Bt9iNAo8ZAZ01Huy/htmlview

The actual Emerson college survey has it at 58.7% of the people find the shooters actions as completely unacceptable. True 16.5% find it completely or somewhat acceptable. Lots of neutral and unsure at 15.9% and somewhat unacceptable at 9%.

BTW this poll isn't perfectly accurate in who they sampled as 37% south,17.7% northeast , 52% women, 18% post doc, 24% college grad,also so many old people versus young. The demographics aren't properly proportional.

That being said best insights we have polling though may be a way of the past

[–] frezik@midwest.social -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In the context of people giving contradictory support to Luigi and denying health care, the neutral responses don't matter much.

[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Personally I think it does as the institutional and mainstream answer is completely unacceptable. To have so many waver or not want to answer is pretty telling/meaningful. IMO

[–] frezik@midwest.social -1 points 6 days ago

OK, but that's not the context of this post.

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago

Fox News and other right-wing networks convince them they are voting for (or more frequently against) something else. Most of those people simply don't know, and won't believe you if you tell them.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Folks saying racism are wrong. It is an -ism though, just not that one. IMO it's Classism. Same reason they flip shit when someone mentions raising the minimum wage. "Flipping burgers is for teens", meanwhile 1pm on a Tuesday they're getting a Whopper completely oblivious to the fact that there isn't a single person under 30 working there.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Selfishness is the sister of greed

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

It’s simple:

The free market works as long as we get rid of these evil people.

Oh why can’t we have a Bruce Wayne who is altruistic and would save us since we clearly can’t trust the public to hold a lot of power.

[–] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world 123 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had this argument with my mom the other day. She agrees private healthcare is a broken system and needs to be fixed, but you bring up public healthcare and she'll fight tooth and nail to argue against it. It's insane. Literal "no take, only throw" tier mindset

[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago

Propaganda. People have been told their whole lives that socialism is pure evil, nevermind what socialism actually is. Public healthcare is socialism, therefore it's evil.

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 71 points 1 week ago

They support him for different reasons, and half of those people are unbelievably dumb.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Believe it or not, some of the people cheering him on actually just like chaos and violence and don't have any deeper politics.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I do not believe you. I believe that it shows that the elections were not true to the opinions of the people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They believe in a free market but also believe the free market is currently corrupt.

It's like people who believe in monarchy but hate their corrupt baron.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Similarly, I believe in democracy and often hate its result.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're very stupid. Most adults have reading comprehension below a 6th grade level

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most adults think they have a higher than average IQ, too. Quite the coincidence, don't you think?

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

No.

They have higher than median HQ. Not average.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 35 points 1 week ago

Because people, on the whole, are very stupid.

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Cognitive dissonance.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My parents hate the insurance companies. But they've been convinced by the right wing that the government would handle things worse.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Which is stupid because the government already provides the majority of healthcare in this country and is doing it quite well. Medicare has a 90+% approval rate from the people who use it and it is far more efficient than private insurance.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I agree.

They're ON Medicare

That's why we are trying to make cuts on medicare. Can't have that shit working properly. Need the people clawing and fighting for every moment of life so they feel lucky to slave away for pennies. The best profits are funded by misery.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Because they don't realize that it will affect them. They think "this won't hurt me because I actually need Medicare. I'm going to stick it to all the freeloaders, of which I am not one."

But just like being in a car, you aren't stuck in traffic, you are traffic.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The long story short is: communication is hard and media is very powerful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

No one is immune to propaganda and the top 1% owns approximately 95% of the media.

The average Joe is too busy living their life to try to understand anything beyond the basics.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] runiq@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Someone in another thread (maybe on Reddit, I don't remember) posited that this is a direct consequence of America's notion of individualism and I haven't been able to get that out of my head since.

It's a slippery slope from individualism to the fear of the Other.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

The United States has fetishized individualism. Enough of the population feels that the individual is above/outside/not part of society. And honestly it's hard to blame them as non participation is becoming the norm due to financial stress, health stress, blatant lack of education, a clear path towards a state sponsored media while the rest of the media just rolls over.

As stress levels rise the commonality guys down. People withdraw from their communities for various reasons and then society starts to compartmentalize. Tribalism becomes the next big thing and before you know it two poor people are fighting because team blue and team red are now mortal enemies that are not allowed to share a single common view.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My wife explains it like this:

Racism.

White voters will cut off their own nose before granting health care to black and brown people.

[–] Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 6 days ago

Once upon a time I'd believe that was all it is/was. I'm convinced now it's more of an uninformed voter thing. "My dad/family/church/friend votes republican and he's a good guy. Besides Fox says if the demoncrats win they'll destroy everything I care about. Sure there's talk about racism/sexism/etc but I don't personally see it or have a problem with minorities, LGBTQ, or women, it's probably just political mudslinging. There's no way the people I love would support them if they really said those things."

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

The politics of the ignorant.

People want a world where they are rulers over everyone and everything and often many people just can't understand that there are other living, independent, free thinking individuals in the world. Most people see other humans as a hindrance to their own enjoyment of life.

They love Luigi Mangione because he is against the private health system that is stealing their money .... but at the same time they like Trump because he is against any socialized sharing of government resources - they believe that government should help only them or the worthy and not just everyone, especially those they think are unworthy.

It's a belief system that is based on the individual and only the individual at the cost of everyone else.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

First Past The Post voting artificially limiting the number of viable political parties.

"How can people support human rights domestically when they support genocide abroad?"

A political party isn't an identity. It's a private company to get candidates elected.

You can be a part of any party and have the conundrum posed in the post.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Surveys seem to suggest Luigi approval isn't that high, something like 18% overall and 41% for youth.

Actually, that 41% would be the more questionable vote but then again both parties love insurance companies so there really isn't a clear way to vote for universal healthcare, lol

[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Even people who want private healthcare don't want valid claims denied or price greedflation. They aren't inherently conflicting stances.

[–] ramsorge 9 points 1 week ago

Because they think: if I have to suffer, everyone has to suffer. If someone hurts someone, I support it because I want to hurt people.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

People have been taught to fear single payer healthcare. Money equals speech and the health industry has plenty of it. They control the narrative since the rich and powerful have bought up the media companies. They also control our lawmakers with unlimited money via citizens United; putting roadblocks in place for any sort of fundamental reform.

People vote against their interests as a function of a corrupt oligarchy running the show. People are getting played and just don't know any better / have a limited world-view.

load more comments
view more: next ›