this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
574 points (97.0% liked)

Science Memes

11440 readers
668 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

code "object-request-error"

msg 'Invalid status 503 Service Unavailable for Some("01/93/da/2e/55/b3/75/2a/84/1c/2ee79309c6b9.jpeg") - {"message":"failure to get a peer from the ring-balancer"}'

lmao so true

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Depends on what you mean by 'consciousness'. If you mean the actual biological process that is happening in our brains - yes. If you mean something different, it is probably not a scientific meaning but more a philosophical or religious one, which is ultimately not a bad thing but you should separate this from actual science.

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What if life's evolutionary end point is always sentience?

[–] theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Then life is even more pointless and cruel than it appears.

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 2 points 4 days ago

That would be poetically fitting for an universe determined to die a heat death.

[–] Wizzard@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Speak for yourself. I try not to think.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If by consciousness, you just mean thinking, then sure.

But if you mean awareness — “phenomena”, if you prefer — then I don’t see why an experiential state would (or could) be entirely secondary to a physical state.

It is, after all, possible for me to write words and perform other physical actions based on my experiential state. In many ways, my mental world is more “real” than the physical world.

For what it’s worth, I don’t think rejecting physicalism necessarily requires embracing the idea of a soul. I’m an atheist, and a neutral monist, for example. But if I had to choose between only physicalism and idealism, idealism makes more sense. Before anything else, I’m conscious.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 83 points 1 week ago (8 children)

You're an electrified hunk of fat piloting a meat-covered skeleton riding on a damp rock that's hurling through space and time.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's actually a lump of lava with a thin crust. Any time the crust breaks we have a very bad time.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The core is metal, the outer shell is hard rock, i would assume what's inbetween is a mix of pop and smooth jazz maybe?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I enjoy Marcus Aurelius paraphrasing Epctetus...

"You are a little soul bearing about a corpse."

[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's weird that we, as people, think that our being or self ends at our skin. And we're just a consciousness controlling a meat cube.

What about all the bacteria living on and inside of us? People would die without their microflora.

What about our subconscious/unconscious doings/thoughts? Are we in control of them? Or are they in control of us? Could consciousness be an illusion? One created by our senses' interpretation of external stimuli.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

anyways this sandwich tastes great

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A CPU is just a rock we hit with magic lightning...

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 38 points 1 week ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] JTPorkins@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is covered pretty well in the Discworld series with the druids.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 40 points 1 week ago (15 children)

I never understood this weird hangup, it's like people struggling to reconcile free will with deterministic actions to a being outside normal time. Of course you'll make the same choices if you rewound time and changed nothing... You're the same, the universe is the same down to the last particle - how does that conflict with the idea of agency?

Consciousness is an emergent property. One neuron is complex, but 1000 can do things one could never do alone. Why is it so surprising that billions, arranged in complex self organizing structures, would give rise to something more than the sum of its parts?

Maybe there's a quantum aspect to it, maybe there's not... It seems like it's all based in this idea humans are so extra special that surely there must be special laws of the universe just for us

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe there's a quantum aspect to it, maybe there's not...

I see what you did there, intentionally or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (7 children)

To be honest the thing that confuses me is that I am conscious. That’s weird, how am I aware, there is no explanation of this. Assuming we pretty much understand all physics and science and there isn’t anything surprising around the corner. Consciousness has to be a physical thing, a computation. But that’s weird as hell too? What rule of the universe governs whether or not something is aware. A brain could do everything it does now without being really aware just pretending. And if that’s true does that mean it’s just the flow of information that can become conscious? Could anything become conscious? If I made a marble Rube Goldberg machine complicated it enough and doing the right calculations could it be conscious?? It feels wrong it feels like we are missing something

[–] u_u@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

Also, I am very interested in the question of, why me? Why am I in charge of this body's consciousness. How was it decided that of all conscious being that ever and will exists, I am conscious of this world from my point of view, at this point of time.

This is the only existential question I can't seem to let go, especially since I am a non-theist. It will be easier to answer if I am a believer, or at least spiritualist.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 6 days ago

Consciousness is the AI assistant in meat mecha suit.

It seems like we make decisions, but we don't. Think of a decision you've made - you think over it, you sleep on it, you imagine outcomes and might decide intellectually - but you don't lock it in. That just happens - sometimes it even flips at the last second, and you don't know why you did it - for better or worse

Our brain does a lot of preprocessing - vision, hearing, balance, walking, language...

Our conscious minds preprocess time. It turns our senses and our experiences into stories, abstract predictions, laterally pattern matching, and ultimately - analysis and recommendations

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

consciousness is stored in the balls

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

hm, but how do you explain post-nut clarity then?

[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 28 points 1 week ago

Next to the microplastic.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Calling it a lump of fat is a bit like calling the Milky Way a very sparse field of hydrogen

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Right, but it doesn't capture the whole story, namely that it's arranged in a very particular way

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry Natural Intelligence bros, but meat can't think. You've been duped into thinking human beings are conscious by Big Omega 3. Intelligence can only exist in computers using real electricity. Not that piddly ion pump stuff.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What about photons, hmmm? They're used for quantum computing and don't (technically) need "real electricity".

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hmm, still a boson particle, the same as electrons. Organic neurons don't transmit boson particles, they create a fake electromagnetic field by equalising ions in solution. It's lame and not real intelligence.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Electrons aren't bosons, they're fermions. And ions generally do contain electrons unless we're talking positive hydrogen or negative anti-hydrogen ions. And the EM field isn't fake (was that part of the joke?).

Also I was attempting to reference optical quantum computing but light also seems to be useful for classical computing. Thereby adding to your joke not contradicting it.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -2 points 3 days ago

Drag was attempting to continue the joke too

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The brain is not a "lump of fat". If you desiccate the brain, most of what's left are lipids, yes, but at that point you are not conscious anymore. The brain is a mix of proteins, carbohydrates, water and fat.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A lump of mostly fat then? Seems needlessly specific.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago

We are ALL thinking lumps of fat on this blessed day :)

load more comments
view more: next ›