this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
248 points (91.9% liked)

Games

33148 readers
981 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just funny and dumb.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 139 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Still has 96% recent and 96% overall positive reviews and an "overwhelmingly positive" overall rating.

I don't think they're making much of a dent. The article is pretty unclear though on why Chinese gamers are mad, other than that there was a possible "dodgy translation."

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 125 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

I mean, it's a blip but they were trying.

The gist of it seems to be a few Chinese gamers are upset that Black Myth: Wukong didn't win game of the year and combined with a bad translation made it seem like Sven, who was presenting, instead of his anti-greed speech was translated into basically saying that he knew who was going to win, like he knew beforehand, and game sales aren't important, and some took that ask he was mocking Black Myth for not winning.

Just language barriers and general gamer stupidity all around.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 108 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Just language barriers and general gamer stupidity all around.

I'm pretty sure nationalistic pride is also a factor. Wukong is not just a game they like, it's their game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] Joelio@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Your right, it should have been belatro

[–] sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 weeks ago (18 children)

Balatro is the objectively correct choice.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)
  • It's decently-made (rarely the case with new titles in current year)
  • Concentrated industrial-grade nostalgiabait
  • Doesn't require the player to be a skilled Gamer
  • Judges determine the majority of the score (who are probably not skilled Gamers)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Have you played Astro Bot? It's phenomenal. It is the best non-Mario 3D platformer ever made. And possibly in the Top 3 if you include Mario.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

And also a PS5 exclusive. Eww

[–] M137@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That has no relevance to how good and deserving of an award it is.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

IMO, it does. Awards showcase and highlight 'best of' games, but what's the point of highlighting a game that is inaccessible to a significant portion of the gaming community? You could potentially make the argument that their purpose is more towards recognising the efforts and success of the devs, but that's not the aspect of awards that are being discussed in this context.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

The people who review the games are the same people who vote for the winner, and Astro Bot was the best reviewed game of the year.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 weeks ago

I understand being upset if your game didn't win, but your game came out the same year as Baldur's Gate 3. I mean come on, you had to know...

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago

Is that with Steam's "recent off-topic activity" system turned on, or off?

Steam introduced something where if they see a large scale of reviews in a short period that express thoughts unrelated to the game itself, they exclude those reviews from the default view of the page.

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 74 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Chinese gamers upset their total mid jingly keys action game didn't win?
Imagine my shock

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago

It's actually from mistranslations that made it appear like Sven was saying wukong is a cash grab

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 68 points 4 weeks ago

There's nothing more awe-inspiring than the online equivalent of a few hundred toddlers screaming for attention.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn't valve release algorithms to stop review bombing? Just delete them

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 weeks ago

They did, but this is so little of a blip, it might not have even triggered.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 31 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

~500 negative reviews, c'mon, what a piece of trash article.

[–] simple@lemm.ee 6 points 4 weeks ago

TheGamer is well-known to be a trash drama-generating website.

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 27 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

China antis are the most insecure out there. It’s always something stupid

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago

it's funnier than thu. there is a Chinese mobile app also getting review bombed because its logo resembles astro bot.

[–] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago
[–] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

So I checked and could not find any review bombing. If there was one, it was tiny and not worth talking about.

load more comments
view more: next ›