this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
240 points (98.8% liked)

News

23655 readers
3549 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Euthanasia accounted for 4.7% of deaths in Canada in 2023, with 15,300 people opting for assisted dying—a 16% increase, though slower than prior years.

Most recipients had terminal illnesses, primarily cancer, and 96% were white, sparking questions about disparities.

Quebec, at 37% of cases, remains Canada's euthanasia hotspot.

Since legalizing assisted dying in 2016, Canada has expanded access, now covering chronic conditions and planning to include mental illnesses by 2027.

Critics, citing rapid growth and controversial cases, warn of insufficient safeguards, while proponents highlight strict eligibility criteria. Debate continues globally.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 106 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I'm surprised it's that many, but it's people who are allowed to die with dignity, and released from a life of pain.
I hate we don't have that right here in Denmark.

[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago

Not that surprising given how big our aging boomer demographic is. This was my father two years ago who had fought a year long battle with cancer before deciding to go with MAID. He was already hospitalized in palliative care and it may have only saved him a day or two more of suffering. In fact after how rough his final night was, I wish he had been able to let go a day earlier.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 weeks ago

At least in Canada people can choose euthanasia because they are in pain rather than because they're bankrupting their family

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would be curious how this affects the suicide statistics.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is the neat part, it does not!

https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/healthy-living/suicide-canada-key-statistics-infographic.html

so 4500 "suicides" vs the articles above 15,300 people. I don't think 15,300 is a subset of 4500.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramsorge 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

It’s ridiculous that there is a prerequisite of terminal illness

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

There's a huge push from the right that this is unethical to offer it in the first place and that soon we are just going to let people euthanize themselves instead of "treating" them. I mean, i don't want people to do this either, but who are we to force a choice onto someone?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago

It makes me worried about vulnerable people getting bullied into it somehow.

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep - "unethical" to let people die without suffering and passing on financial ruin to loved ones, but "ethical" to kill criminals for their misdeeds. That's superb logic from the right.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I don’t disagree with you, but I think you’re thinking US not Canada. Death penalty is not Canadian. I don’t think? And health cares free (not to say there’s not other costs associated).

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

We haven't had the death penalty for decades. We stopped using it in '63 and officially abolished in '76 for civilians and '99 for things like treason.

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Yes - US perspective. Whacky world view, IMO.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One step at the time.

Making euthanasia legal for people with terminal illness is already hard enough and I'm glad it is now possible in a lot of countries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There were issues early on and people who shouldn't have been offered the option, got offered the option.

[–] ramsorge 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, anyone who wants the option should have the option. The requirement should be to make an appointment.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

No argument against that.

The problem was (as I understand it) the doctor didn't read the room and it was received poorly.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Quebec has 9 million divided by Canada's 41 = 22% by population.

[–] Fleur_@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If allowing euthanasia is a recent change I assume there will be a large bump initially as the backlog of patients that have accumulated gets treatment. I would expect it to dwindle out over time

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago

Lets keep context here. The largest generation in history is at the end of their lifespan in many cases. The stats are as inflated as that generational bubble.

load more comments
view more: next ›