this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
1267 points (98.0% liked)

Work Reform

10146 readers
242 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 304 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Toxic positivity in action

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] huginn@feddit.it 238 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The stressed employees were almost certainly the high performers lmao

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 62 points 2 weeks ago

And when output and production drop 35% next quarter, you can be damn sure they'll whip out the "We're a family here!!!" talk as they announce even more layoffs to pad the bottom line.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 196 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

Whenever you are having a bad day just remember you had like 1/4 chance of spawning in India

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 90 points 2 weeks ago

There are ten livestock animals in captivity for every one human. You're still lucky to be born a human anywhere on earth, because we are the monsters.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] subterfuge@lemmy.world 148 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“The beatings will continue until morale improves.”

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 48 points 2 weeks ago

"Beatings didn't work. Let's try hunger and homelessness"

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 148 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Well, that is going to backfire because they just made all new stress for the current employees

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 97 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, they did, but the remaining employees won't dare complain about it so management sees this as a twofer win.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 127 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Don't ever engage with culture sensing surveys honestly. The only place they weren't a trap (ironically) was the US Army where they did it on paper, punished people for putting their names on them, and walked right past your entire immediate chain of command to their bosses with the results. And the one time things were truly bad they literally brought in a Sociology expert to study our unit and figure out how things had gone bad, it resulted in all new leadership and team building exercises, in a war zone. (These results do not extend to other branches, I had one done by the Navy and it was corpo trap bullshit, got a lot of the Army guys there by surprise.)

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 45 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Or engage with them but expect the repercussions.

I'm very candid when this shit comes around my corp and am extremely nuanced in explaining the culture challenges.

The trick is to not explicitly call anyone out and highlight it's a systemic problem.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

That's a very fine line though. and you're hoping they don't fire you just for being the bent nail.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 weeks ago

I have always engaged with every one of them and have been negative quite often yet never anything bad came of it. Probably because we have employee rights where I live. So the actual problem is americas lacks of rights.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 125 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Imagine firing all competent employees

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

The stoner dudes high as balls 247 who don't give a shit and are not stressed a bit: :DDD

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 107 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Please tell me this is fake. Please?!?!!??

True story: I once worked for a startup where the head of HR kept a spreadsheet he called his "naughty and nice" list. For every employee he had a score that boiled down to "risk to the company". He would send out surveys like this and say things like "your feedback is strictly confidential", then use the responses to determine people's scores. Of course other things like any kind of complaint he overheard went into it too.

[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

It seems that it's most likely an out-of-touch marketing stunt. The company, Yes Madam, is apparently launching some sort of corporate wellness program type thing so they are likely going to pivot this publicity into "Treating employees like that would be awful right?! But companies do have stressed employees and should take care of them with...blah".

I hope it fully backfires and they go out of business.

EDIT: It just hit me that they are going to say "We didn't have a single employee who indicated stress on the survey, because we take care of our employees."

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's India. Of course it's not fake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Years ago I heard this story about a company in India that held a fire drill. Once everybody was gathered outside, they made the announcement that for about a third of them their key cards wouldn't work anymore because they were fired. My colleagues from India at the time said that sounded very real.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The only thing I could find is that Yes Madam is a real company and that the sender is indeed the HR head of that company. So if it's fake, someone kept the header and signature of a real email. Or maybe a real email sent on April 1st? I have a hard time believing that this is real (not that a company wouldn't do this, but the fact that they would admit to it so blatantly like it's not a bad thing).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] s3p5r@lemm.ee 91 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

And they just included them all in the 'to' instead of bcc. Very professional.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Heikki@lemm.ee 74 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Every company I've worked at sends these surveys out and says they are "anonymous". I never respond to them.

  1. If they are truly anonymous, why does my boss personally call me out to respond to them? I know it may track if you have submitted the survey. If it has that capability, then it can track you.

  2. I don't want a "moral boosting" pizza party. Give me more time off or more pay.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I respond to all of them with brutal honestly. My most recent one was along the lines of

"A major topic of the town hall meeting was the push to get [sales number] by the end of the year. We did the same thing last year and I got a 2% raise. What is my incentive to make you money if my raises don't even match inflation?"

Even if it's anonymous, my boss knows it's me. This way I can bring it up in my review as a callback as opposed to trying to awkwardly work it in to the conversation

[–] Heikki@lemm.ee 41 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If a "raise" doesn't even cover inflation, it's not a raise.

Edit: The best raises I've ever received were from leaving a job to a new job

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rhacer@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Recently at a company town hall, "please respond the anonymous employee satisfaction survey."

My boss a couple of weeks later, "HR says they need more surveys from our group. Please encourage your teams to fill them out."

Yeah, completely anonymous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 63 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)
this is ~~likely~~ satire/a publicity stunt by the way

edit: proof. trust your gut yall.

[–] markstos@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 24 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

id believe it if there was a single outlet doing original reporting :/ all of them are just reading verbatim the same screenshots we have here. some of them bother to put the word “allegedly” in.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 58 points 2 weeks ago
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

And no one gave critical/constructive feedback ever again. Mission accomplished!

[–] superkret@feddit.org 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We did it, Patrick! We solved workplace stress!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 41 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago

It's always those punks in HR

[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jinarched@lemm.ee 33 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

I have seen the exact same behavior here Canada with companies that are led by Indians. They treat it like a sweatshop. and this was an office.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 2 weeks ago

"let's give them a test to see which one of these little drones wants to kiss our asses the most"

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This has got to be from The Onion... Right?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] choco_crispies@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago

So fucked up

load more comments
view more: next ›