this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
47 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

1573 readers
15 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In Short

  • Bihar family follows GPS, ends up deep in forest territory
  • Forced to spend night in car amidst wilderness
  • Walks 4 kms to find network, rescued by cops next day
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There have been a few articles recently blaming "google maps" for people driving into stupid places. The previous one I saw was where someone drove off the end of a bridge that had been washed out a year ago and not yet rebuilt.

In both cases, I feel the driver was to blame. They were the one operating the vehicle and ignoring all the indications of danger around them, not google.

If google maps told you to drive off a cliff ...

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm just imagining a future where Google Maps gets compromised and then the attack commits genocide by making it tell people to crash there car.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like a black mirror episode

[–] Steve@startrek.website 2 points 2 weeks ago

iirc the actual cause of the crash was a complete lack of barricades leading to the bridge, because India.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure they would have done better with mapquest.

[–] airglow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

MapQuest uses OpenStreetMap data, so that may actually be true for areas where Google Maps has poor coverage.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think this is Google's fault. You should not just take what it says as hard objective fact.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

So they kept driving deeper into the forest....then didn't turn around....and to make matters worse... decided to leave the car and walk 4km away to find a signal ...the fuck.