this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
914 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

11448 readers
991 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 56 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

The people pointing out the women killed by bears vs men stats a few months ago need to understand this as well lol

Like I am fine if you want to meme or dunk on men but once you bring bad stats into it that’s when I get serious.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 50 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

The first time I saw the man or bear question, I assumed it was a setup for victim blaming. Neither choice is going to be a win for the woman.

Based on experiences, she doesn't trust men so she picks bear? How dare she judge all men. So illogical!

Or she picks man? Then she should be prepared for an inevitable assault because eventually the man in the woods will be one of the bad ones and she should have known. She should have been more careful or just stayed home!

The whole thing was never a maths question. It was a rage bait question to rile up men who hate women and to give women an unwinnable binary choice. The only "winning" answer is to decline to play this stupid game.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The new women in mens fields trend is the same thing. Its there to agravate people by doing the thing people claim to hate just to a different group. Equality does not mean every one gets a turn at being the opresser and I can see why young people start to consider themself anti feminists if these two trends are the most interaction you've ever done with feminism. Which is likely since I don't really see any other big social media movements for it.

Maybe its not my place to critisize the way they choose to operate but all im saying is if you told me both of those trends were Russian plots to stoke anger at feminists I'd believe you easily.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

All good points I hadn’t considered! However, some people did try to turn it into a math problem which I had to object to at that point, since they were doing it wrong.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

I assume that part of the intent with these type of scenarios is to draw attention to toxic masculinity by baiting out toxic responses, which is fine and obviously it's effective if that is the intent. However, any attempt to respectfully disagree with the premise was also treated as toxicity and that just made me not want to engage with feminists or the discourse at all, which seems counter-productive.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's obtuse to treat the bear metaphor as a math problem. It's doubly so to correct the work.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

But would you rather be alone in the woods with a statistician or a bear?

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

yeah I think the way I always read that question was in the hundred duck sized horses vs one horse-sized duck sense. The average woman passes by, say, in public, hundreds of men per day in a city, right? I read that question (and the implication) that they’d prefer from a safety standpoint if each one of them was a bear, which is more of a video game premise than a situation anyone would survive.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Like I am fine if you want to meme or dunk on men

That's pretty F'ed up

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

Important to note here that you should not stand on an open field (being the highest point) or below a tree (high point that might drop wood) during a thunderstorm.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

No one shakes a vending machine. Its part of gen-x schooling to learn you rock the machine back just a bit and then let it settle back on its feet.

What are they teaching kids now, if not that?

[–] higgsboson@dubvee.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I know some (genX) people who discovered a neat trick to dislodge all the contents of a vending machine. Involves at least two people and a 2x4. I wouldn't call what is done "shaking" per se, but you can be sure when the vending machine gets set back down, it feels mighty shaken up. And also empty.

But that would be dangerous, so don't do it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

I only know Vending Machine lore from Hollywood because they're a lot rarer where I'm from so in my head "vending machine = shake" checks out.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

No, you punch it until it releases your goods.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Um, there were more than a few Gen X that got hurt by vending machines. We didn’t have an immunity to that.

However, a skill we did have to exploit vending machines in the pre-digital age was to learn which alternating buttons you could press rapid-fire to get two sodas instead of one.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"More people get bitten by New Yorkers than sharks"

Who lives around sharks all the time?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean, coyotes can't catch roadrunners despite having access to unlimited Acme products. They're no match for humans.

[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sucks that the movie that was finished about the coyote fighting Acme in court for all their failing products got scrapped for tax purposes.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Please quit with this tax write off misinformation.

They cut their losses. We don't know the details why, but for some reason they decided it would cost too much in money or reputation to continue with marketing and release.

Not everything is a billionaire conspiracy. Sometimes they just realise they made a film too shit to release, or some person in a suit just wanted to spite someone.

[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Never said it was a write off. The video I watched on it did say that someone who worked on the film said it was for tax reasons. It's a single source that might be incorrect, though.

Edit: Here's the video I watched on it. Says right on the title that it was for tax purposes and I don't think an attorney would get that part incorrect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Roadrunners are considerably faster than humans.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

i'm sure i can run faster than a road

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Say what? The roads in Texas are 85 MPH!

[–] rothaine@beehaw.org 19 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Most car accidents happen within a mile from home

...because that's where you're driving most often

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago

a depressing amount of people in the US have literally just driven over children while backing out from the garage, because the cars are so big they can't see the kids

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 weeks ago

90% of fatal accidents occur in the northern hemisphere

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 3 points 3 weeks ago

I can beat this. My first accident was less than 50 ft from the property line of my father's house. Somebody pulled out from the stopsign on the corner of our property without looking :( (rip mercury mariner I still miss you)

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well there was that one time the vending machine decided to attack, but in general, it's a human causing it to fall over.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

sometimes humans cause me to fall over, but you don’t see me going around killing people

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Cow's outnumber people on my block. But there are fences between them and us. However geese outnumber people in my yard.
I have added goose wrestling to my resume.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago

Good thing shaking babies doesn't kill you then, or that stat might be even higher

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Getting an error message and a tiny thumbnail.

edit =finally appeared. My life's dreams are fulfilled and joy reigns in the land.

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At least it didn't kill ya

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

It came up this time. It's a good post and I'm glad I waited.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

If vending machines ejected their beverage as vigorously as coconut trees, people wouldn't put them on the same category on those statistics.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 6 points 3 weeks ago

Having grown up around coconut trees, and gravity, I've long been aware that it's foolish shake that tree if you don't want to loose the fruit it holds over your head.

load more comments
view more: next ›