this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
406 points (98.1% liked)

CanadaPolitics

1895 readers
3 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules:

All of Lemmy.ca's rules apply

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

OTTAWA – A smug man from Canada wasted no time this morning chastising Americans for re-electing terrifying liar and felon Donald Trump, despite the fact that he plans to vote for terrifying liar and asshole Pierre Poilievre in the next Canadian election.

Matt Hunter, a 36-year-old barista, took time away from attending a Poilievre rally to rant about how stupid Americans were for falling for Trump’s fascist bullshit.

“I just can’t believe that someone could look at a petty asshole running on slogans, lies, and faux outrage and think, ‘Yeah, this guy will be good for the country,’” Hunter laughed, taking a quick second to repost an “Axe the Tax, Build the Homes, Fix the Budget, Stop the Crime” tweet on X. “It makes no sense. Luckily we up here in Canada have more common sense. Pierre says so.”

“When Poilievre becomes Prime Minister next year, he’s gonna stand up to Trump. They’re so different in ways that I can’t even describe. Don’t even ask me what those ways are. Just trust me, bro. He’ll bring Canada home again.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Spot on.

This is Canada's largest weakness: we put the bar at American stupidity, and anything marginally better gives us insufferable smugness.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

I did the same with my idiot brother. :-/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Pierre Pollievres inevitable upcoming victory is just depressing as shit. I hope Quebec votes bloc just for the middle finger factor, but the sad truth is they will probably break conservative too.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I normally vote NDP even though where I live is usually a Liberal stronghold, but this time I'm tempted to vote Bloc.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As much as the public sentiment is against Trudeau, voting for whoever can best prevent a Conservative majority is my pragmatic protest vote.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

ABC is always my vote (that means green for me). This could actually be quite the opportunity for NDP/green to pick up seats. If Mr.PP really steps in it andloses support and NDP gets off their ass and gains support it wouldn't be totally impossible to have some freaky 5-way power struggle. Probably wishful thinking, but I think with a lot of coordination and luck it could happen

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am firmly planted in your dream/vision, thankfully my riding usually goes NDP

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If there was a Bloc rep in my Ontario riding I would be carefully considering them vs my own NDP rep.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (11 children)

It's surprising that no other province or group of provinces ever created their own version of the Bloc...

[–] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I doubt we could do much worse if we just elected 11 different provincial/territorial lobby groups that have to caucus together to pass laws.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

That's my opinion as well, or even grouped lobbies (BC, prairies, Ontario, Quebec, Maritimes + NFLD, territories)

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

If you're in a region where it might go either way, vote strategically to get anyone but conservatives in, if that's the Bloc then so be it. I personally have always voted for them since I live somewhere where it's either them or the Liberals and I believe in what the Bloc stands for, but remember, in the end they're there to defend Quebec's interests first and foremost and provincial policies impact you much more than federal ones and even if there's a referendum at some point you can just vote against it if you're not a separatist.

[–] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's fucking ridiculous that the only party with significant seats that doesn't want to expand the tarsands also want to break up the country. Maybe Canada is too stupid to exist.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Canada is very much a collection of separate interests that banded together for pragmatic reasons. All this nationalist nonsense people espouse is entirely manufactured. The idea that there even SHOULD be a national identity is bullshit. There should absolutely be a way for groups to leave again when it is no longer in their pragmatic interest to stay.

[–] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, Quebec doesn't evenn really want to leave. Legault has found a winning strategy that will keep his party in power for decades: Never hold a referendum, but leverage that notwithstanding clause and general nationalist animus to take and horde as much power in this province as possible forever. That way everything that goes wrong is because of the feds, and everything that goes right is because of the glorious CAQ.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you seen Legault's numbers? 😂 His party is getting wiped out of Quebec come next election and the PQ will be reborn unless the Liberals elect the Messiah as their leader!

[–] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Glorious, I love to see it. At least the PQ pretend to be progressives when they aren't selling out the north to foreign mining companies, restricting minority rights and generally sucking shit.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I've learned from previous elections (and possibly too late) that I shouldn't be voting "strategically". If does the same as I do then we'll keep sliding right l,like the US.

Vote for what you believe in and let the party politics follow. Anything is a betrayal to yourself. Don't feel bad for voting for the unlikely candidate - especially if you've already voted for election reform.

[–] Slayan@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Last poll i saw (when he tried to reverse gov) was 50%+ bloc followed by 25% ish cfor the con

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I worry that Pollievre will happily invigorate the Quebec separatist movement.

I'm at a stage in my life where I value stability. I feel like my family can weather many storms, but Canada crumbling isn't one of them.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Lil'PP is about to lose Quebec big time based on polls numbers but he will have a majority without Quebec like Harper managed to get once.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I haven't met anyone yet who was pro Trump and didn't have a "fuck Trudeau" bumper sticker or flag or whatever.

But I do live in Alberta where there are just straight up genuinely people, in droves, that are pro trump antivax idiots.

The other day several people all in a group tried to convince me that electronic voting was unreliable and only hand counting votes could be relied on...

I love my province, but I feel an incredible sadness for most of the people that live here.

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Electronic voting is an absolute security nightmare. As a software engineer, the relevant XKCD sums up my position nicely: https://xkcd.com/2030

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I'm talking about electronic counting machines. Which have been repeatedly demonstrated to be far more accurate than counting by hand.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (11 children)

As an engineer, you should know that no system is perfect and there are several trade-offs and threat models to consider. And electronic voting can't be discussed in a vacuum, but measured against existing voting systems which are also full of their own kinds of issues and risks.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] after_act@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

I like my bubble of Edmonton. The rest of the province scares me

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

My antivax sister in law moved there two years ago

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's no shortage of those kinds here in Ontario. I'm sure it's not nearly as many, but I'm only trying to point out that, it's not a uniquely Alberta phenomenon.

It genuinely confuses me that people can have their whole identity be defined by "Trump good, Trudeau bad"

Are people really this uninteresting? I mean, I have opinions on politics, even US politics. I don't feel strongly enough about any of them to put a bumper sticker about it on my car, nevermind buy or fly a flag about any of it. I don't even put political signs on my lawn (nor do I allow anyone else to). I just have so much going on that I can't be arsed to advertise that I even have an opinion on what's going on in politics.

I try to always vote, and show up for every election, unless there's a very good reason why I can't (like being very ill, injured, hospitalized, etc). But I am not my political views, and I can't understand people that build their identity around a politician. Surely something else you do is important? No? Okay then.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

The only thing I can hope is that after seeing Trump's disaster south of the border people steer away from Poilievre.

However at this point I'm terrified they'll actually embrace it and prove we're no better than they are.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I came across an absolutely horrendous term the other day, "Maple MAGA". Used un-ironically by someone I kind of know. I am quite concerned about our next election as most Canadians do NOT remember this tool was in charge of the housing portfolio under Harris. They also have not interacted with him as a low paid employee. I guess no real work experience doesn't really matter either, only ever a politician. At least Trudy, with his trust fund, was a teacher.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maple MAGA?

What the actual fuck. They know what "MAGA" means, right?

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah... I don't get it myself but... We may have issues

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't worry we in Germany have the same Problem. According to the polls trump would have gotten like 15% here, but our conservatives and straight up fascists are at about 50%.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, the fasch got around 15%. I suspect it's the same 15%.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what even are the options this time? I've spoken to a few people saying they woulf be voting for polievre but they didn't even know who else was running. I'm not feeling very hopeful about any of this considering being loud and worse than stepping in shit barefoot clearly works

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

I think it's because the Conservatives are the only ones campaigning right now. I'd imagine once an election is called Trudeau and Singh (or whoever replaces them) will start campaigning a lot more.

But yeah I'm not overly hopeful either...

[–] KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

sigh

This isn't even parody. I know know several Matt Hunters.

load more comments
view more: next ›