this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
906 points (96.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5708 readers
4909 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Maybe it's time to start focusing on reasons to vote for a candidate instead of against one. Trump got less votes than 2020 and won.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 4 points 23 hours ago

I have to second this one.

Most of the people I hang with tend towards 3rd party. All of them proudly touted their votes for the democratic candidate in this/the last election, but each was also very clear they were only voting that way as a way to vote against Trump.

They all hate Biden and Harris.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Practically speaking, what is supposed to be done about it? It's all protected by the first amendment. Even if they were to somehow pass a new kind of "fairness" legislation in a future blue wave, the stacked SCOTUS will strike it down.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They could at least try to end corporate personhood.. make it so that corporations are not protected by the 1st amendment and don't get free speech... Anything they blast out needs to be scrutinized and any misinformation needs to have heavy penalties... Sure the actual person saying the thing is protected, but the corporations pushing it out or allowing it to go out through them get crushed under fines... This would require a party that is not working for the oligarchy/donors though

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They could at least try to end corporate personhood… make it so that corporations are not protected by the 1st amendment and don’t get free speech…

You'd need a supermajority to amend the constitution, and that is completely unrealistic.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago

It wouldn't be easy, but I think people, especially young people, want to vote for people who will actually fight... Over and over as long as it takes

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] jawa21@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago

Anyone with an AM radio has known this for decades.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

So Dems don't turnout to vote and this is the Republican propaganda machines fault? The day the Dems actually take accountability for their continual fuckups is the day I might vote for them again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It was never a tenable solution.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›