this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
233 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19170 readers
6385 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Republican-led state of Missouri asked a judge on Monday to block the U.S. Justice Department from sending lawyers to St. Louis on Election Day to monitor for compliance with federal voting rights laws, even after the city's election board agreed to permit it.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/SWbKO

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TammyTobacco@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

A reminder that the Missouri Attorney General is a colossal piece of shit.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 101 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Of course they don't want them there. They can't claim voter fraud if they're there.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which is why they should be at every polling place in the nation. Every single one.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For sure. Let them try to explain how Democrats cheated when Trump loses then.

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well, you see, the Dems control the justice department because deep state hunter's laptop biden crime family buttery males, q.e.d. the poll monitors were only there to rig it for the Dems. Pizza gate!

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Ooh look! China!

They can't do the fraud.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

This is how you know Republicans don’t care about election integrity

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damn, crazy how people keep insisting we have a free and fair election system, then do shit like this.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Didn't you ever play with a kid who always cried "NO FAIR!" any time he lost something? That's, like, half our country right now...

Free and fair for them, not for you...

[–] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 38 points 1 day ago (4 children)

MO's not likely to swing the presidential election, but the eyes on them are essential nonetheless

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

I'm voting to restore health rights to my wife and daughter! And that's just in addition to saving democracy. Here's to cancelling out the rednecks' votes!

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I had to travel to the ass end of the county to vote early for Harris. Purely anecdotal, more women than men by a good bit. And the poll workers were commenting on the unusual volume. Still too much lead poisoning to counteract. So trump is still likely. But this could be closer than we think.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

we find ourselves in the uncommon predicament in which the popular vote actually matters, if only to neuter a fascist clown who will cry no matter the outcome.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The supermajority in the stage legislature is at stake, as well as several Federal House seats.

[–] Timmy_Jizz_Tits@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Omg the gop has a super majority at the house level? Yikes, I feel sorry for their citizens.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gerrymandering, baby! If you think it sucks at the national level, it gets even worse in the states.

Some of these districts are so heavily cracked/packed that Dems would need north of a 70% turnout advantage to take a simple majority.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thing is, you can’t gerrymander between husband and wife. Wouldn’t it be something if the wife vote showed up for Harris in MO.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's the noise. But the idea that women can't be just as fascist as their husbands never seems to bare out IRL.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

fucking toothless degenerates

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

What are they hiding