this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
720 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19144 readers
6569 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nothing helps stop Trump bleeding support from the senior woman demographic quite like a young whippersnapper punching a 70-year-old woman to the ground for her support of Harris.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] crunchyoutside@lemmy.world 96 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Domestic terrorist. She was attacked by a domestic terrorist. This crime would seem to meet the DHS definition.

We need to start calling this crap what it is.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Damn right it does. This individual needs to be charged and prosecuted.

[–] primarybelief@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The "media" are a bunch of spineless cowards who can't seem to report actual news because their fear of litigation and severance from their shitty news company, which is owned by an individual who absolutely has an agenda, is far too great.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago

When I think of conservatives, I always think of youths sucker punching old Asian women in the back of the head because of Covid. This is typical.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 281 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Big tough guy sucker punched an old lady. Trump would be proud if it were possible for him to give a shit about anyone but himself.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 326 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not only that:

According to witnesses, Bossio said, the 17-year-old was walking away from a separate altercation with a male Harris supporter when he struck Tomasko and knocked her to the ground.

He did it because he was pissed at a male supporter but was too big of a wuss to throw hands with someone who could plausibly fight back, so to solve that, he sucker-punched an old lady. They're not just abusive garbage, they're pathetic cowards.

About as courageous as his role model.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 62 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Trump supporters are lower than snake shit.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (14 children)

I told my coworker today that there is no good trump supporter. They'll are either ignorant, selfish, or vile. The first group i dont blame because they're idiots, the other 2 groups can go fuck off to the void.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] auzy@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Snakes at least keep rat populations under control

Trump enthusiasts generally are rats

[–] zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ahornsirup@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Now That's Republican Toughness! ^TM

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 151 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The lil shit isn't even old enough to vote

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 107 points 3 days ago

He's certainly old enough to get real time if they try him as an adult for aggravated assault.

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 86 points 3 days ago (1 children)

At this rate he will never be able to vote.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Honestly, I hope he gets to vote in the future. Everyone should serve their punishment and get the chance to learn from it.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Emotionally I dislike your reply. Logically it’s correct. What good is “paying your debt to society” but never being forgiven when you live a better life after punishment.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

You should just never lose it. Voting isn't a privilege to be awarded for good behavior, never mind that laws are sometimes themselves unjust and often disproportionately applied. Should people in prison for weed possession be unable to express their opinion about whether weed should be illegal?

Voting is both important and generally not that critical. The idea matters a lot more than the actual impact most votes have. There's just not much in the way of compelling benefit to denying prisoners their vote and plenty of risk of the law, either intentionally or unintentionally, being an implement that can affect who gets to vote on the people that make and enforce the law.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

A minor, get his shitty MAGAT parents in the courtroom too.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh hey, it's a Trump supporter practicing what Trump is preaching. What a surprise.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 96 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don’t need to keep being reminded that Trump supporters are the absolute worst pieces of shit on the planet.

[–] ravhall 51 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But, we can’t ever forget.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Yeah, I think we all deserve at least a little bit of forgetting every day. We’ve been enduring this bullshit for the better part of a decade. We don’t owe that asshole 100% of our attention all the time. Fuck him. And fuck everyone of his followers, too.

The Nerenberg trials got it right by executing the lot of them. We need more of that after this election cycle. There is no value in keeping them around. It’s not like any of them are launching rockets or anything.

Oh, fuck…

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 100 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Little dummy must’ve been watching Andrew Tate.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 108 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Oh, 100%, society is underestimating the terrible influence Tate, Peterson, and similar grifters are having on men (especially younger men).

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Jordan Peterson is really bad because the carnivore diet he promotes would starve the chud’s brain of nutrients.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 65 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Peterson is bad because he appeals to lonely blue collar millennial men who, if they had positive male role models or better friends, would have a real chance of being actual decent people.

Tate is bad because he appeals to young men and boys who lack the life experience to know the guy is a loser and a grifter.

My opinion anyway.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The harm I notice Peterson doing is setting back men's mental health movements. A big barrier I run into working in mental health is not having enough male role models either locally in my area or public personalities online who are willing to discuss things like medication and therapy, but also to discuss the important lifestyle changes that have to be made, particularly in terms of healthy relationships. A big part of men's mental health needs to be men supporting men instead of competing for women to then use as their sole emotional support. In addition to placing an unfair burden on women, it's just frankly a burden that can't and ultimately won't be carried, leaving men with inadequate support when there's a better solution to be had. Instead you have peterson (and others, but Peterson has a fancy psych degree to hide his bullshit behind) perpetuating these antiquated ideas that men should be competing with each other. Men deserve better.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

Glad he is charged. What a jackass.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

What an absolute weak turd holy hell.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

just MAGAt shit.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 33 points 3 days ago (4 children)

These damn DEMOCRATS need to Learn how to Tone Down their Rhetoric!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

more of that to come if the angry orange gets installed

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Or if he doesn't.

There's going to be violence. More people will die because of him, and i can't do anything about it and I'm going insane.

load more comments (2 replies)

I'm going to stand in line to vote tomorrow...should I take my can of Fox 5.3?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

He's just doing what donnie told him to do.

load more comments
view more: next ›