this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1374 readers
62 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week's thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

(page 3) 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

For any drive by readers who slightly want to know more background about some stuff: Why Richard Feynman wasn't a great rolemodel.

(more context for the drive by readers, Feynman is often held up as a great man in STEM circles, and even more so in the world of LessWrong Rationalism. (Which is fine if it is about scientific achievements, but it often goes beyond that as here in their page on 'traditional rationality')).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 13 points 2 days ago

NASB - Brian Merchant's celebrating the first anniversary of Blood in the Machine's release

Reading through it, its clear an earlier comment of mine was dead-on - the public image of the Luddites has been fully rehabilitated, and we can primarily credit Merchant for pulling it off.

[–] maol@awful.systems 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Forced to endure an episode of an Irish tv programme about the environment in which a guest sincerely listed carbon capture & storage and small nuclear reactor as potential energy solutions. As mentioned above, the earth is our coffin, hope is a mistake, etc

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Carbon capture, small nuclear reactors. We stopped thinking big. To really solve climate change we need to do one easy, but big thing. Blow up the Sun.

[–] maol@awful.systems 12 points 2 days ago

You'll hear no complaint from me.

[–] istewart@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Malcolm McDowell successfully blew up a star in one of the Star Trek movies, even if it did immediately get reversed by a time-travel MacGuffin. Perhaps we just need new leadership?

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 2 days ago

Don't think we should put another space guy into politics, no matter their expertise at blowing up stars. They tend to go bad quickly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Been seeing some stuff from this artist. This is the most recent thing to pop up for me. They seem alright, though I don’t have the energy to fully investigate their politics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Just some thoughts about musk trying to be liked and doing whatever idiotic thing he can to become liked, specifically speaking at trump rallies:

  • The maga turn as framed by this working theory makes sense, but it is also just what you’d expect of any idiot that got lucky under capitalism.
  • I read a hypothesis somewhere that when he does the jumping jacks at the trump rallies, he’s trying to make the letter X with his body. I’m just hoping this somehow derails the fitness industry.
  • it’s telling that he wears that occupy mars shirt, the thing that people liked him for before, well, pretty much everything after he became well known.

Also: I don’t think we’ll make it to mars!!! Fuck mars. The earth is our coffin and hope is a mistake.

NB: am not a US voter.

[–] maol@awful.systems 11 points 2 days ago

The Martians seem to think that Mars will be like a new colony, with all the "hope" that implies, but it seems to me that colonization was a wretched process for many of the colonists (to say nothing of the people being colonized). Musk is only cheerful about it because he thinks he'll be whipping the slaves rather than working the arid red soil.

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The earth is our coffin and hope is a mistake.

such a metal album name

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Their grindcore coverband is called Earthcofffin Hopecrusher. Their 2 minute long album with 14 songs was pretty good.

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Afterwards I was thinking it could also pass as an emo album name. I wonder if there is a good guessing game in "metal album title or emo album title?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago

Brb mailing this to myself

I think "any idiot that got lucky under capitalism" is a pretty good description of Musk and his type, to be fair.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShakingMyHead@awful.systems 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

You know that thing that happened with the AI generated DOOM?

Well, someone decided to do the same thing with Minecraft, and you can see that the results are... basically abysmal:
https://youtu.be/7Jd-Rr9cJYo?si=-9XZ51ss6cBuSiC3 Skip to 2:00 for the actual "gameplay".

TL:DW nothing is saved outside of the view screen, things aren't even saved within the view screen, the resolution is like 240p at 20fps, input latency and mouse latency is awful, and this was all apparently done by training on literal millions of hours of Minecraft footage. The mid-range computer I had from 2006 could run the game better than this. A 14-year-old netbook could run the game better than whatever supercomputer they're using to render this.

Note that the person in the video isn't part of the team/whoever that created it, just someone who is reviewing it.

[–] self@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago (7 children)

oh cool, Minecraft LSD: Dream Emulator edition

which would be a cool concept, if the generative AI model weren’t incredibly prohibitively expensive to run, trained on plagiarized videos, and incapable of coherently tracking state (believe it or not, LSD: Dream Emulator does have a gameplay and progression loop… game-like things without one tend to get dull very quick)

load more comments (7 replies)

Note that the person in the video isn't part of the team/whoever that creates it, just someone who is reviewing it.

See, there's the mistake. You can't let outside people actually interact with the thing; you need to stick with cherry-picked 2-3s clips.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've seen this floating about quite a bit, and everyone I know is dunking on it - the most frequent comparison I've seen is calling it "Minecraft with dementia".

[–] ShakingMyHead@awful.systems 13 points 2 days ago

It also shows why those DOOM demos were only 2-3 seconds long, because that's how long it can keep cohesion for.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›