this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
87 points (93.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3242 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. establishment is sleepwalking toward a crisis. An openly antidemocratic figure stands at least a 50-50 chance of winning the presidency. The Supreme Court and the Republican Party have abdicated their gatekeeping responsibilities, and too many of America’s most influential political, business and religious leaders remain on the sidelines. Unable to rise above fear or narrow ambition, they hedge their bets. But time is running out.

What are they waiting for?

They may be waiting, but the rest of us Americans don't have to

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

They don't make it super easy to find the bullet points:

  1. "One of these is a far more muscular approach, known as militant or defensive democracy... the militant democracy approach empowers public authorities to wield the rule of law against antidemocratic forces."

  2. "The United States has a tool on the books for disqualifying anti-constitutional candidates: Section III of the 14th Amendment disallows former public officials who have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from holding office."

  3. "A third approach to defending democracy is partisan gatekeeping. In the absence of legal tools to block extremist threats, the responsibility for fending off such threats falls to political parties. In a healthy democracy, party leaders police their own ranks, expelling antidemocratic elements or refusing to nominate extremists or demagogues for public office."

  4. "When authoritarians make it onto the ballot, prodemocratic forces may turn to a fourth strategy: containment, in which politicians from across the ideological spectrum forge a broad coalition to isolate and defeat the authoritarians."

  5. "That leaves a fifth strategy: societal mobilization. Democracy’s last bastion of defense is civil society. When the constitutional order is under threat, influential groups and societal leaders — chief executives, religious leaders, labor leaders and prominent retired public officials — must speak out, reminding citizens of the red lines that democratic societies must never cross. And when politicians cross those red lines, society’s most prominent voices must publicly and forcefully repudiate them."

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There’s also a 6th option, but talking openly about it gets you put on a list. Not to mention, it has some very fucking serious downsides, because that’s a Pandora’s box you can’t easily close.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As a fellow Oklahoman fuck Democrats here. I will be voting Harris but when I went to the Democratic booth at state fair to get Harris signs they had none. And none were coming. Also guy running the booth gave two shits about Harris getting a win. When asked how to get signs he shurg and walked away. He refused to dicuss how the Democrats could speard in Oklahoma nor any candidate I should vote for. Meanwhile Republicans had fucking 5 booths and plenty of Trump shit to sell.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Having the same problem here in Oregon. We have a large fence facing a busy street, talked to the local Democrats about hanging a banner. We could put up an 8 foot by 12 foot banner easily.

"Uhhh... have you tried Etsy?"

Let me get this straight, I'm willing to give the campaign money, for a large sign, that you could profit on, and you... just didn't think to have that done?

[–] goober@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Electoral College nonsense? It's super easy to get Harris signs here in Wisconsin.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

For the amount of money that flows in for elections, the party organizations are shockingly incompetent. Somehow those massively overpaid consultants are too busy to think about implementing free-advertising options to support on the ground outreach.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Publicly repudiating Trump and warning of red lines that must never be crossed? Of course! Why didn't anybody think of this before?? Democracy is saved! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I have long since stopped listening the the New York Times.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt are professors of government at Harvard, and this is an opinion piece.

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The Fifth path: We build a time machine. Go back to when it was a baby. We fill its bottle full of its Dads hair growth formula and then bodabing bodabang, no more orange fuck face.

Saved you a click

[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

that's a new one!

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

That wouldn’t be a solution; Fred Jr or Robert would have ended up filling Donnie’s shoes, and we’d likely be in the same position today.

At this point, it’s about more than just Trump, just like WWII was about more than just Hitler.