this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
386 points (82.2% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
4099 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 286 points 1 month ago (16 children)

What with the weird freebooting article? This ‘article’ is just a description of Alec’s video with the clickbait cranked up to ten. Gotta love a major corporation using small creators’ work for free ad revenue…

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 168 points 1 month ago (15 children)

You could add the link so people don't contribute to ad revenue if you feel strongly! https://youtu.be/zsA3X40nz9w 💜

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm fairly sure that the image is even a screenshot from the video. Uncredited I notice.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is, I just watched the video an hour or so ago.

edit: In fact, until I read this thread, I didn't notice the URL and thought this was a link to the video.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's enough YouTube videos just recapping an article. But I agree it's lazy

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] stellargmite@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think they mean the same thing happens alot in reverse: YT vids about news articles. Not wrong, but whataboutist.

[–] cheeseburger@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

also not relevant to Alex's content either.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 166 points 1 month ago (6 children)
[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

"Wait, is that a Duracell battery check?"

Oh man that transition. Chef's kiss. Amazing

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 111 points 1 month ago (4 children)

But the video purports that normal people don’t really test batteries.

Yeah, it was a novelty that increased the price to manufacture and didn't actually add anything of value to users.

Either you put batteries in something and they worked or they didn't, and if they stopped working the next step is try different batteries whether or not the little gauge showed it had charge left.

Now if it was added to rechargeable batteries, it would be pretty useful because tou could do something with the knowledge of a battery being at 50%. But a lot of systems with rechargeable batteries have them built in and some other way to show remaining charge like a percentage on a screen.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

Now if it was added to rechargeable batteries, it would be pretty useful

I think the reason we haven't seen that is that NiMH rechargeables have fairly stable voltage during discharge while alkalines don't.

[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I think all of your points were covered in the video, sometimes almost verbatim.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

It was pretty useful as a kid for feeding my Gameboy and Game Gear with batteries I rescued from the junk drawers of friends and family. If they were low, I knew I had to save more often to avoid losing progress if they went dead while I was playing.

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I concur about rechargeables - it doesn't seem common for devices that take AA or AAA to have a battery gauge and it would be nice to be able to check the level on my rechargeables stock so I can know if I should top them off without needing to put each of them into the charger.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 81 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I was a kid then, but I remember that I had to push so hard my fingers hurt... I used a multimeter.

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well the pros and cons of the multimeter are addresses in the video! He uses a meter on a dead battery and it still shows a deceptively reasonable voltage when not under load. The built-in tester draws more current.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It turned out that batteries randomly lying around are always empty. Functioning batteries are still in the device it's operating or in the box it was sold in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dotslashme@infosec.pub 43 points 1 month ago

It broke too many thumbs.

[–] Toes@ani.social 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This guy is great. He can make anything sound interesting.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 month ago

He makes everything sound interesting.

Ftfy

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He used old batteries, but I actually had new Duracell batteries with this feature very recently, in 2022 or so (Germany).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (14 children)

Did the power check work or was it snakeoil I remember trying to see it while hurting my hand.

[–] ilikecoffee@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It did, see Technology Connections' latest video on it, he explains fully how it worked. Quite clever tbh.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The video is in the article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Although, he admits in the video to "faking" his footage of it working, by using a off-camera heat source. (His batteries were quite dead.)

But, as someone that lived through this time, they did work, as long as you pressed hard enough in the right places. It was hard to tell if the battery was dead or if you weren't pressing hard enough

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 month ago (7 children)

It never went away. I have a duracell battery with power check sitting next to me on my desk

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] silentdon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Does anyone remember the battery testers that were built into the packaging? I think they were based on the same concept.

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

They are mentioned in the video.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asifall@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have a really distinct memory of finding a bunch of these in a friend’s house when I was a kid and every one was empty. After watching the TC video I think it’s more likely I just wasn’t pressing hard enough and had no way to know that. Anyway, I can see why they stopped making them.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago

Yea, you have to press till it hurts, lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LinkMiguel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I remember those.

Would be nice to have them on my 18650s

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

The voltage-to-capacity radio for lithium is much less linear compared to alkaline so it wouldn’t really work well :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It failed often enough that it wasn't all that useful. A cheap battery tester is better. And for 9volts you can also use the tongue test, lol (don't really though). My grandfather used to do that all the time.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›