this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
66 points (98.5% liked)

Ukraine

8237 readers
736 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mirror Mirror

https://t.me/SBUkr/13061

Special forces of the SBU arranged a real "road of anger" against the enemy

Every step of the occupiers on Ukrainian land turns into a death trap, carefully planned by the special forces of the Central Security Service "A" of the SBU. High-precision strikes do not leave the enemy a chance - they die together with the wreckage of their equipment.

Yes, over the past week, our soldiers "minus":

▪️ 10 tanks

▪️ 33 BBM

▪️ 18 artillery systems and MSWs

▪️ 4 air defense systems and one EW/REP system

▪️ 219 vehicles

▪️ 25 UAVs and 22 communication antennas

▪️ 148 enemy fortifications and firing positions

▪️ 2 warehouses with ammunition

176 occupiers were also destroyed.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I liked the part where it exploded like fireworks, but I also liked the part where it fucked putin's advances.

[–] ironsoap@lemmy.one 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder about this as part of the visually confirmed data. Hamny destroyed and unrepairable vs repairable, etc.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There are plenty of estimates out there, but it's extremely scattered. The problem is that there are dozens of conditionals attached. For example, if a vehicle was just damaged was it actually recovered? If it was recovered, was it actually repairable? If it was repairable, did it make it back into service? If it made it back into service, how does it count against all previous estimates?

I exaggerated a little, but the point remains. Especially with Russian vehicles, actual numbers are so obscure, probably even their own commands couldn't give you an answer.

So. Probably the most reliable way to make educated guesses is to make estimates on visible reserves factoring in visually confirmed total losses. Covert Cabal and his buddies on YouTube seem to do a fairly good job of tracking Russian reserves using the latest satellite pictures.

After all of that, I don't have a good answer for you. There is a somewhat reliable way to get "before and after" data but anything that happens in between is anyone's guess.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the flip side, not every drone hit is going to be debilitating to armor. I catch myself going: "where's the secondary explosion?" quite a bit, I want that Russian equipment destroyed, but sometimes I just don't see the confirmation.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I have seen it take one drone for a kill or as many as five (or more), depending on the armor. Still thought, a top-down hit on tanks are going to be rough. Even if you don't have confirmation, you can make a good guess on the damage based on where the hit was, the attack angle of the drone and the explosive used.

[–] StarshotJohn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago