this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
232 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3846 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's good that he's going away for 22 years. However, the sentencing guidelines called for between 324 to 405 months (27-33 years) so by the Judge's own calculations this is a miscarriage of justice and yet another right wing domestic terrorist is being handled with kid gloves. Fucking disgraceful.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

27 year minimum sentences are already insanity. If the justice system is supposed to be corrective rather than vengeful, there's nothing to be gained from these overly long sentences. No one's willingness to commit a crime is going to change with a 22 year sentence vs. a 33 year sentence, and the offender is no more likely to reform in years 23-33 than they were in years 12-22.

22 years is A LONG TIME. So long that they're almost certainly going to have fully adapted to prison life as "normal" long before it ends, and long enough that no one would ever consider it a reasonable cost for potential reward. Someone getting a two-decade sentence was entirely counting on not getting caught/charged.

[–] meldroc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm all for keeping him in there for longer, simply for the purpose of keeping him out of circulation. Doesn't hurt my feelings that he's going to be in his 60's before he gets out.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. In ordinary cases, I might be for leniency / shorter sentences. However, these people are very dangerous. They are home-grown terrorists and a message has to be sent others who have similar ideas about civil war and/or insurrection in support of fascists like donnie. Keeping people like this out of civilization for a very long timeout is critical.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah but if we were trying we could rehab this dude in like two years. Probation conditions and monitoring could keep him in check, not just him pretty much any convict.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if we could rehab the entire GOP in two years.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

When it a group I think it's called reeducation, which is arguably needed.

These people's entire ideology is based on the lies of trickle down economics, rage culture, sexism, and racism. Whatever education they got, it wasn't enough to make them realize how stupid and incorrect their ideas are.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

22 years ago was 2001. So the equivalent time from 9/11 to now in prison.

Doesn't seem like enough to me. I mean I went from 30 something to 50 something, I still have life in front of me.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If your desire is for him to not have any life in front of him, then your goal for the prison system is neither to prevent crime nor to rehabilitate criminals. Just admit it's bloodthirstiness and execute the wrongdoers.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Attempting to overthrow the government should be a life term or near enough to it.

It helps that he can't vote for the next 5 presidential elections and on release will no longer be allowed to own guns, but 22 years doesn't seem like enough.

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How long should he go in for?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A common maximum sentence in other countries is ~20 years (with exceptions for those who remain a threat to public safety after the standard period).

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/2/12/18184070/maximum-prison-sentence-cap-mass-incarceration

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I just wonder what the rehabilitation plan is for someone like this. How do you bring a leader of a group like this back to being a normal citizen? And what will the alt right call it even if it were attempted? Liberal/Communist indoctrination?

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's pretty much in line with US stats

https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_inmate_sentences.jsp

... but some people do deserve more, of course

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

17% being >20 isn't really in-line. That's 1 in 6 prisoners.

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...and 5 in 6 being < 20

I'm not saying it's perfectly in line but it's not one everyone in prison is doing life

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

You would expect most inmates, even in a retributive system, to not have done anything worthy of a max-length sentence. That most sentences are not two decades long doesn't really mean much. You'd expect that in any system short of North Korea.

The US is way out of the norm for its prison lengths and number of people imprisoned, because people like the retributive feel of long sentences. The >20 year sentences are entirely pointless, but the sentences below that are frequently for crimes that would never warrant such a long sentence elsewhere. Norway, which has a maximum sentence of 21 years, has an average incarceration length of 8 months. In the United States, the average incarceration is 63 months (5 years).

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This would carry more weight if you cited sources for your statements. ;)

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Science has known harsher sentencing is not a deterrent since the 80's. Breaking up families and communities causes intergenerational poverty and trauma, and as a result causes more crime. That's what they teach in criminology because that's what's proven by the science.

People who want harsher sentencing instantly reveal themselves as unserious about criminal justice or in any way reducing crime.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It’s both corrective, and preventative. Animals like that piece of shit shouldn’t be trusted to walk amongst the public.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Should've been maximum sentence.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the reduced sentence allowed a swifter sentence, it may be a good thing overall, as this can now be used as precedent.

[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can try to spin it as a "good thing" that the Trump appointed judge failed to deliver a sentence in accordance with the guidelines all you want. The fact of the matter remains Tarrio got off far too easy and by at least five years.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It was probably part of a plea deal. Defense agreed to lighter sentence in exchange for not appealing.

[–] aphlamingphoenix@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Article says Tarrio plans to appeal.

[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now you're just speculating.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 1 points 1 year ago

Can you suggest another realistic possibility, or are you just being contrarian?

[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You should read the article because it clearly explains that he's planning to appeal. But they've sneakily hidden that information all the way down in the third sentence.

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

He asked U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, "please show me mercy" and that he "not take my 40s from me."

Try 40s and 50s, and some your 60s, you traitor scumbag

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LOLOLOL. This is the "find out" stage for all these wanna-be tough guy hyperpatriots.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nothing patriotic about these fucking incels.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I really wish news articles on guys like this would not use photos of them where they are trying to look all "hard" in their stupid Meal Team Six gear, smoking a cigarette and/or wearing the glasses and backwards hat, and instead would use pictures where they look a bit more ridiculous.

Like when Henry was arrested. Or this one:

[–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why ex? He is still very much involved in the ideology of it and hasn't changed. Just because he is in prison doesn't make him an ex proud boy does it?

[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ex Proud Boys leader. He is no longer the leader.

[–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah gotcha. That makes more sense. Just want to have the correct facts.

[–] SignificantCaptain76@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

sooo.

Proud Boys' ex-leader

grammar hard

[–] remer@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. Let’s see what his daddy Trump gets. And good luck trying to get a pardon lol

[–] NYPariah@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Good, let them all rot.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON, Sept 5 (Reuters) - A former chairman of the right-wing Proud Boys group was sentenced on Tuesday to 22 years in prison for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of Donald Trump trying to overturn the former president's election defeat.

Enrique Tarrio was convicted of charges, including seditious conspiracy, for his role in planning the storming of the Capitol, when thousands of supporters of the Republican then-U.S. president violently tried to stop Congress from certifying the results of an election that Trump falsely claimed had widespread fraud.

Oath Keepers militia founder Stewart Rhodes in May was also sentenced to 18 years.

Nordean and Rhodes had previously been tied for the longest sentence handed down in the case.

More than 1,100 people have been arrested on charges related to the Capitol assault, and of those at least 630 have pleaded guilty and at least 110 have been convicted at trial.

Special Counsel Jack Smith, who was tapped to investigate broader efforts to overturn the 2020 election, has charged Trump, the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, for trying to keep himself in power.


The original article contains 302 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 36%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

22 years is nothing to sneeze at, but I see Danny Masterson got 30 years to life. Yes, rape is obviously a terrible crime. But if this d-bag was actually successful in his terrorism, he would have negatively impacted MILLIONS of Americans, possibly causing all kinds of death and misery.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do we even know that this guy isn’t antifa in disguise?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They are everywhere...