this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
70 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19103 readers
4538 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Gallup analysis released on Friday found the U.S. partisan gap in religious identity is widening.

In an aggregate of five Gallup surveys conducted from May 2021 to May 2023, 26 percent of people who say they have no religious identity “identify or lean towards the Democratic party.” In comparison, the aggregate found that only 11 percent of those who profess no religious identity “identify or lean towards the Republican party.”

“Looked at differently, across the combined 2021-2023 data, equal proportions of Americans identified as Democratic or Democratic-leaning (46%) or Republican or Republican-leaning (46%),” the analysis read. “Yet, the group of Americans who are religious nones split 63% Democratic versus 26% Republican — far different from the population at large.”

Twenty years ago, only 5 percent of Republicans and 7 percent of Democrats cited no religious identification, just a two-point gap. By 2013, those numbers had risen to 6 percent of Republicans and 19 percent of Democrats.

“The key takeaway is the possibility of a spiral or self-fulfilling prophecy effect — the idea that as religion becomes identified with Republican and conservative politicians and positions, it will continue to drive Democrats and liberals away from religion, amplifying the pattern by which Republicans increasingly dominate the group of those who remain religious,” the analysis read.

Other findings in the analysis included Republicans being more likely than Democrats to identify as Protestant at an 18 percent gap.

“By contrast, the percentage of each party identifying as Catholic is roughly equal. Unlike Protestants, Catholics have maintained a roughly stable percentage of the American population over time and, as seen here, have remained largely immune from the partisan divide evident among Protestants and nones,” the analysis continued. “Explanations for this phenomenon are tied up with — among other factors — the impact of immigration on the composition of the Catholic population.”

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, well, well. It's almost like religiosity has a corollary relationship to being a backwards moron who is susceptible to dangerous indoctrination and avoiding critical thinking like it is hot lava.

[–] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't have to, though. In fact, believing in a higher power should make us kinder to others. Republicans taking over religion is their greatest coup so far.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

First, treating someone better solely because you are seeking a celestial reward or to avoid the threat of eternal damnation (!=) altruistic or ethical behavior.

Second, there is an inverse relationship between religiosity and altrusim/ethical behavior more generally. You don't see organized groups of atheists collectivising and weaponizing their beliefs in order to persecute other people based on race, sexual identity, or religion.

Lastly, it wasn't Republicans who took over religion. It was a marriage of convenience between two groups who had interests that aligned on the common ground of creating a crypto-fascist, nationalist dictatorship.

How dare you try to shift the blame away from Christianity when the entirety of the modern evangelical movement has been centered around capturing & controlling as many state/local governments as they can in order to wield minority power over national politics.

Turns out that religion is, and always has been the single most useful and predictable control mechanism for priming and justifying atrocities that suit political ends across large populations.

Please grow up, and stop being so naive...

[–] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not "solely," But it does give you an extra incentive and extra capacity when you're at the end of your resources, and that's a good thing.

Some of the biggest atrocities on earth had nothing to do with religion. If you want the real culprits, it's money and power. Religion is just one of many forms of power to some people. And those people would use something else if not for religion.

So many religious people do good every single day, inspired and organized by religion. When was the last time you donated to humanitarian efforts? Or fed the hungry, volunteered to take in refugees, dug a well to provide clean water, donated education to those without access otherwise, or helped out your neighbors? Unless you're doing that at the same rate as the religious, you have no ground to stand on. And if you were, you'd know better how much religions contribute.

I've contributed to all those things within the past year. Who is the naive one now? The one sitting there feeling superior because of a few talking points? Or the one rolling up their sleeves and doing the work?

[–] batsinlavender@artemis.camp 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The more people have tried to shove religion down my throat the less I believe. I started out with some faith but after the last few years I'm now an atheist. Religion in the US is just an excuse for control and subjugation.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

This. I can accept some fundamental truths underlying the ideas presented in religion, but I've only ever seen them corrupted to bludgeon people into obeying. Which is exactly the opposite of the intended message.

Either it's all fake, or it's being abused by evil people. Either way, I want no part in it

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A Gallup analysis released on Friday found the U.S. partisan gap in religious identity is widening.

In an aggregate of five Gallup surveys conducted from May 2021 to May 2023, 26 percent of people who say they have no religious identity “identify or lean towards the Democratic party.” In comparison, the aggregate found that only 11 percent of those who profess no religious identity “identify or lean towards the Republican party.”

“Looked at differently, across the combined 2021-2023 data, equal proportions of Americans identified as Democratic or Democratic-leaning (46%) or Republican or Republican-leaning (46%),” the analysis read.

“Yet, the group of Americans who are religious nones split 63% Democratic versus 26% Republican — far different from the population at large.”

“The key takeaway is the possibility of a spiral or self-fulfilling prophecy effect — the idea that as religion becomes identified with Republican and conservative politicians and positions, it will continue to drive Democrats and liberals away from religion, amplifying the pattern by which Republicans increasingly dominate the group of those who remain religious,” the analysis read.

“Explanations for this phenomenon are tied up with — among other factors — the impact of immigration on the composition of the Catholic population.”


The original article contains 307 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 35%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!