this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
120 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59116 readers
3075 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
120
OpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseus (marc.info)
submitted 2 months ago by tux0r@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db2@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

What a fitting last file.

[–] waigl@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Is OpenBSD seriously still using CVS for development?

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's weird. It's pretty unorthodox to use a pharmacy chain for development.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

To be fair, they have a pufferfish as a mascot, so there's bound to be some need for pharmaceuticals.

[–] Fred@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

CVS is the authoritative repository of code, and they recommend to users to use that or reposync (built atop of CVS) to keep their system updated.

There is also a GitHub mirror , and got is an OpenBSD project, and I suspect a number of devs use one of those for local work until it's time to push the changes to the authoritative tree.

[–] Jagger2097@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They can work on replacing that next

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?

[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For example, maybe branching is something you'd like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?

[–] tux0r@feddit.org 9 points 2 months ago

OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.

[–] don@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Reminds me of the GNU/HU(I)RD.