this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
605 points (94.3% liked)

World News

32317 readers
571 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Outdoor_Catgirl@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago (20 children)

No shit. Western training and equipment is not fit for purpose. Acting as a colonial cop by bombing with impunity ≠ attacking the strongest defensive lines of the 21st century. All their wunderwaffe just gets blown up by mines or drones.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 49 points 1 year ago (135 children)

Somewhere in the Pentagon there surely must be a series of rooms isolated for this war. In them intelligence is gathered, counterparts in Ukraine can be in instant contact, resources from both armies are tracked, tactics are formulated, simulations are run. How do I know this? Because this would be too good of a learning opportunity to pass up.

And those folks ain't talking.

[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago (39 children)

For sure. Thinking of this war as a giant test ground for defense industry ghouls to experiment on is horrifying

load more comments (39 replies)
load more comments (134 replies)
[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 year ago (113 children)

Haters gonna hate. Still though, they'll need to be cordial if some of these critics are also paying Ukrainian bills. Being rude is the fast track to falling out of favor with foriegn taxpayers.

load more comments (113 replies)
[–] puff@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pretty telling that the new line being fed to NATO worshippers is 'don't say anything critical about our objective failures'. This is, ironically, the same message Goebbels pushed when failures began to mount on the eastern front after Stalingrad and then Kursk. As the Soviet steamroller continued to Berlin, the line in the media was 'it is unpatriotic to say we are losing'. And then they lost.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›