this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
-11 points (39.2% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2233 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Where were these fools during the RNC? There was a fraction of this fervor.

[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Republicans are ontologically evil. Pick any topic, situation, policy, etc. They're going to do the worst thing possible. There's no negotiating, convincing, appealing to morality. They're evil. Full stop.

Some people have this wild expectation that the Democrats should be better. Crazy I know.

While we're on the subject. Why are democrats so averse to progress? That's their job. Repubs are regression, dems should be progress. But while the dems move at a glacial pace if at all, the repubs can get their shit together to roll us back by decades almost immediately.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well done reading the article. Literally point #1

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

But what about whataboutism - if these protesters weren't willing to protest whataboutism how can we trust them!

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'll agree with one point: protesting is all they have left. It isn't going to get anywhere as the bluff will get called and may actually hurt support by annoying staunch anti-Trump friendlies, but, it s all they have left so go for it. Keep throwing your tantrum until you're spent, then vote Blue as it's your only real choice and everyone knows it.

[–] stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 months ago

I respect their right to speak their mind. However, I believe there are other efforts currently where we can make a much bigger impact.

There are some huge issues on the table: fascist takeover, at least two genocides in different parts of the world we are involved with, systemic racism, LBGTQ rights, and many more.

We could get hung up on any one, and be correct in protesting that what we’re doing isn’t enough, to the only party even likely to entertain it.

But we won’t even have the option to protest if fascism successfully subverts democracy. Those protests only work if Trump doesn’t win. Project 2025 will not condone dissent.

I feel strongly about each of these issues, and agree with the protestors, but I feel that I am best served helping people register to vote/check registration status, supporting down-ballot dems, speaking against any Mom’s For Hate speakers in our PTA meetings, etc.

My main goal is to work to ensure that we have the ability to protest those important topics in a Post-Trump democracy, where the public has more bandwidth to energize. None of what we will happen if Trump cheats his way to the Oval Office again.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

In These Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for In These Times:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://inthesetimes.com/article/democratic-national-convention-dnc-protest-gaza-harris-walz
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support