this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
154 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
95 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Comcast blasted for seeking "loopholes" in rule requiring disclosure of all fees.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If your billing is too complicated to be accurately described to your customers, then you may have put yourself in a situation where you are incapable of being honest with your customers. That's on you.

It's the job of regulators to ensure that you are honest with your customers; therefore, they can reasonably forbid you from having billing so complicated that it cannot be described accurately.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's funny, my local ISP tells me I owe X dollars a month and that's what I pay. How on earth do they do that? Comcast is telling us it can't possibly be that simple

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The airlines managed to figure it out, weirdly enough. Calculating the price of an airline seat is Turing-complete, and at least one airline software service, ITA, needed the runtime compilation feature of Common Lisp to do it efficiently. Yes, when a user asked for a ticket price, their systems wrote and compiled a piece of code to determine the answer.

Oml thats actually insane and incredible. My goodness wow

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Many companies, specially telcos, have a complex scheme of paid plans to confuse the users so that they become fed up and say "ok, so how much do I have to pay". This is their exact objective.

My local ISP (not a part of some huge elite ISP) is similar to yours. Pay X and you get unlimited internet for a month at Y Mbps uplink/downlink. Somehow it's too complex for Comcast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] misguidedfunk@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I’d love to have a local option. We get spectrum or wind stream, which means spectrum. They charge whatever they want because they have a pseudo monopoly.

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

mine even manages to do it for the price they advertise. and without a data cap. and without having to have a comcrap router in order to pay more to not have a data cap. i had my own router i didnt want to use theirs mine was better. but the only way i could find to pay to not deal with the cap was to have their router. fuck that.

[–] psudo@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but are they making their faceless shareholders insane profits? I say this as a joke, but I do feel like that's a large reason why Comcast and the like are so terrible to their customers.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 31 points 1 year ago

"We don't know what they are until we charge you."

[–] hexachrome@monero.town 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Boohoo Comcast. Hopefully the FCC tells them to get wrecked.

If the FCC is anything like the SEC/DOJ I wouldn't hold my breath. All of these regulatory agencies are regulatory captured via the revolving door.

[–] Casmael@u.fail 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man do I ever get sick of corpo bullshit

[–] c2h6@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Too hard to disclose fees but easy to charge them huh

[–] BackOnMyBS@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's some straight up gaslighting shit. If they can figure out to charge it, they can print it on a bill.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Typical corporate lawyer speak.

[–] smolgumball@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't wait to try this during tax season next year

[–] debounced@kbin.run 2 points 1 year ago

lol, my thoughts exactly

[–] Rentlar@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

It's a simple solution, Comcast. Don't charge any fee you aren't willing to spend the effort to disclose.

[–] falsem@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

broadband facts

FCC stahp, I can only get so hard.

[–] k32481@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

If it is too hard/difficult for a company to itemize all their fees, they are charging way too many fees.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

Funny, it was never too hard when they billed me.

[–] Prevailing@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That headline is some NotTheOnion material.

[–] c2h6@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ooh does that community exist here? Forgot about it!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreenPlasticSushiGrass@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Comcast: "But I am le tired."
(This reference goes back a few years, kids!)

[–] ASK_ME_ABOUT_LOOM@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Then have a nap... AND THEN POST ZE FEES!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] c2h6@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh god now I feel both nostalgic and old at the same time.

I thought the end of the world and "I JUST WANT BANG BANG BANG" was the funniest shit ever back then.

[–] reric88@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Blast from the past woooow

[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'm so glad I don't have to use Comcast any more. A small local ISP (Sonic) expanded to cover my area last year and offers 10Gbps symmetric fiber for $40/month - half the price I was paying Comcast for 1.2Gbps down / 35Mbps up.

[–] frostycakes@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm super jealous. At least I'm moving to a new apartment with fiber from CenturyLink at it, but even they are running $70/mo for gigabit. I'm living the T-Mobile 5G home internet life right now because CL only has DSL at my current place, and fuck Comcast in general.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They need to do a reset of their pricing them. Figure it out again from the ground up.

I pay exactly what my isp advertises never a cent more.

I live in a third world country.

[–] jherazob@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Helium@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Comcast is a truly rotten company. Like without fail they continue to impress me on their new clever ways of misleading customers. Like remember "10G" from earlier this year...?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mydispo@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The label hasn't even reached consumers yet, but Comcast is already trying to create loopholes." Is anyone surprised? I'm not a huge fan of Google's privacy practices, but their Fiber service is outstandingly easy to use and fast. I'm lucky to live in Kansas City though...

[–] c2h6@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I wish Google fiber were in more states.

[–] c2h6@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Nonono it's easy to charge you, it's just hard to disclose it. Duh

[–] psysok@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

They will just have to create a fee to "cover the costs" of having to tell you what they are going to charge you.

[–] chriskoss@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I think comcast getting fucked by regulators forcing fee disclosure has the potential to make a lot of people 'too hard'

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] c2h6@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nonono it's simple when we bill you, just too hard to list it upfront.

[–] SomeGuyNamedPaul@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

There's an easy fix, just don't allow charging any fees that aren't listed along with the advertised price. See? Very simple. They'll figure out how to list them thereafter, believe in them.

[–] miroppb@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

But according to Comcast, "two aspects of the Commission's Order impose significant administrative burdens and unnecessary complexity in complying with the broadband label requirements."

"We much prefer to impose significant financial burdens and unnecessary complexities on our ~~victims~~ customers."

[–] Pluto_Is_A_Planet@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

poor comcast. gotta feel so sorry for them /s

[–] Spaceman2901@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Have they tried…not being corpo sleaze?

load more comments
view more: next ›