this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
702 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
4087 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
702
Musk's new idea (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BlackRose@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NeutralFlame@lemmy.world 294 points 1 year ago (71 children)

Twitter had a great thing going on. It was not perfect but I never thought it would get absolutely ruined in such a short amount of time

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 207 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (54 children)

Just like a year ago it was considered an essential part of modern discourse and society. The media was heavily dependent on Twitter. Now, Twitter has lost a lot of influence.

If Elon had simply kept his stupid mouth shut, he wouldn’t have been forced to buy the company, let alone for such a high price. Once purchased, if he had been less of a maniac and just managed Twitter in a boring way that maintained the status quo, then it would still be better off today than it currently is. Everything Elon has done has made the company less valuable and driven away users.

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 53 points 1 year ago (14 children)

on purpose. by design. with intent.

[–] aruraios@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

It just works.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
load more comments (68 replies)