Matrix

3288 readers

2 users here now

An open network for secure, decentralized communication

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

Thoughts on Matrix for kids (lemmy.perthchat.org)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by palitu@lemmy.perthchat.org to c/matrix@lemmy.ml

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have been trying to figure out a way that my son can have a messaging account, that doesn't track him and that we can limit who he has access to and who has access to him.

What are you thoughts on matrix for kids?

Are there any features available for that sort of control? I really only want him to be able to contact his family (and also indoctrinate him into matrix and open source young 😉)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] vintprox@geddit.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Sure, just find a way to self-host Conduit or Construct for Matrix and don't federate with outliers - it would work like a charm for internal communication (disclaimer: these light-weight servers are in beta stage, unlike the resource-hungry Synapse). Wait, NextCloud and Revolt have implemented chats, which are encrypted and open source already? As such, I don't observe any special benefits of Matrix for your use case (unless you're gonna do bots and stuff). 🤔 You have a lot of choices! 😉

[–] palitu@lemmy.perthchat.org 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Yeah, I was hoping that I could white list specific accounts (family). I can use my existing account, and it keeps it simple. The others end up walled gardens.

[–] carlyman@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm on the same path trying to find a solution. Is it possible to just whitelist certain accounts without all the public rooms. E.g., I have my own instance, but want to allow a DM from friend@matrix.org without allowing public rooms or other random DMs?

As far as I can tell...you can't. Debating just using XMPP instead.

[–] peturdainn@mastodon.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@carlyman @palitu on your own instance you only have the accounts and rooms you want. I have zero public rooms on mine. Only if you join a public room elsewhere does it get synced to your instance.
Blocking DM is a client thing I guess? I have had zero unwanted DM so far though...

[–] palitu@lemmy.perthchat.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so, I could make a room called mum and dad, have it "private" and only invite the three accounts.

it could work.

[–] peturdainn@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago

@palitu exactly

[–] carlyman@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What my perfect use-case would be:

Private instance (@mydomain.org)
Allow other instance USERS to be able to DM me (user@matrix.org --> me@mydomain.org and vice versa)
NOT allow my instance users to join rooms on other instances (child@mydomain cannot join room@matrix.org)

But given how DMs are essentially rooms...I'm not sure that level of fidelity is possible

[–] peturdainn@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@carlyman not sure how/if you can prevent a user on your instance to join another instance room, my kids never tried this anyway... They want snapchat and not that weird thing their dad set up 🙃

[–] palitu@lemmy.perthchat.org 1 points 1 year ago

I get that... but from my wife

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (7 replies)