this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

/kbin meta

5 readers
6 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago
 

Because currently, it seems like the only thing it's recording are downvotes. Meanwhile upvotes are completely ignored, leading to pretty much every profile I see having a negative reputation.

Also, I have a very fragile ego and my -6 reputation hurts a bit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] albatros@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Currently :

  • "Boost" adds reputation. It's a kind of retweet.

  • "Downvote" removes reputation

  • "Upvote" does nothing. (edit : for reputation)

This is because previously the upvote was boost, they were switched around to be similar to other fediverse systems.

Dev mentioned in another thread that the reputation system should be changed to have up/down count instead of boost/down. But they have a lot to do right now so it might not be the most pressing issue...

[–] TooL@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ah, okay that does make a lot of sense. Poor ernest must be getting swarmed by idiots like me asking for QOL changes. Thanks for the info.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

-6 wrt ego hits was funny. Go check out mine.

[–] akaxaka@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I annoyed some shitlibs defending lemmy.ml and I can’t even create an account or read most posts there. I basically said we Americans are as propagandized probably as much as Red-leaning countries’ citizens.

[–] Deref@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe don't call them shitlibs?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)