this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2020
0 points (NaN% liked)

main

15747 readers
49 users here now

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!

Top Image of the Month will remain the Banner for a Month

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!


gun-unity State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

guaido Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

smoker-on-the-balcony Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

frothingfash Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

just-a-theory An Amainzing Organizing Story

feminism Main Source for Feminism for Babies

data-revolutionary Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide


ussr-cry Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eduardog3000@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (12 children)

(Hot?) take: consensual sex is consensual sex (minors can't consent ofc). It might be gross to most people, but so is gay sex.

[–] VolcelPolice@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (2 children)

Yeah but if it ends up with a kid they didn't consent to look like a member of the royal family

[–] Themfor@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago

Right, but we don't do eugenics even for people with known hereditary diseases.

[–] carlin@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

anyone can have disabled kids 🤷‍♂️

[–] 90u9y8gb9t86vytv97g@hexbear.net 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

This ignores the reality of incest having a far higher chance than non-incestual pregancies of producing a birth defect.

But I agree, we don't do eugenics on people with Down's or autism, so that justification here is bullshit.

[–] eduardog3000@hexbear.net 1 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago)

I can't remember the specifics, but it's something like women over 40 have just as much chance of producing a birth defect as incest. The real problem comes when incest is repeated for multiple generations, like royal families did. But that's extremely unlikely without the "royal blood" concept anymore.

load more comments (9 replies)