this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
71 points (90.8% liked)

Selfhosted

40183 readers
540 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You may have noticed a few of my posts here, I am very interested in self-hosting and what advice can you give to a newbie? maybe some literature, video, I don’t know~

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Docker? Steep learning curve? You drunk mate?

When it comes to software the hype is currently setup a minimal Linux box (old computer, NAS, Raspberry Pi) and then install everything using Docker containers. I don’t like this Docker trend because it 1) leads you towards a dependence on property repositories and 2) robs you from the experience of learning Linux (more here) but I it does lower the bar to newcomers and let’s anyone setup something really fast.

In my opinion people should be very skeptical about everything that is “sold to the masses”, just go with a simple Debian system (command line only) SSH into it and install whatever is required / taking the time to actually learn Linux and whatnot.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

I'd like to point out this is a hot take.

Enterprise infrastructure has been moving to containers for years because of scale and redundancy. Spinning up new VMs for every app failover is bloat and wasteful if it is able to be put in a container.

To really use them well, like everything in IT, understanding the underlying tech can be essential.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Yes, that’s a valid use case. But the enterprise is also moving to containers because the big tech companies are pushing them into it. What people forget is that containerization also makes splitting hardware and billing customers very easy for cloud providers, something that was a real pain before. Why do you think that google, Microsoft and Amazon never got into the infrastructure business before?

[–] falcon15500@lemmy.nine-hells.net 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why do you think that google, Microsoft and Amazon never got into the infrastructure business before?

Amazon was in the infrastructure business well before containers were the "big thing".

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

You're missing the point.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)