this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
110 points (97.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

19564 readers
1436 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I learned "pure" JS back in 2013, when HTML5 was brand new, and I still don't get most of the stuff going on nowadays.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I work on a large code base that was built in .NET 4 with a lot of jQuery for the front end. We're modernizing it, but it's very slow work. A significant part of the work is improving the organization of scripts, of which there are thousands. We're not even prioritizing getting rid of jQuery, because it works. To rewrite all the stuff that works, instead of focusing on structural matters, dependency management, maintainability and security, would be insane. (And that's just the JS bits, on top of which there's all the legacy .NET stuff to do.) We aim to get it into a state that will leave it working and maintainable in future without excessive effort.

Sometimes I wonder who these people are who always promote this year's library or framework, then next year promote something newer. Do they work in real companies with real applications under heavy use? Have they ever had to maintain a codebase that was written more than 6 months ago? Or do they just build proofs of concept and small apps and pontificate a lot, then move on to the next job before things get serious?

[–] joel_anderson@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I work on marketing websites which are essentially disposable. So every 3 years you start over from scratch (in a new version of some CMS). So I don’t get to build super cool functionality much, but I do get to work with newer tech stack. (I still don’t need 99.99% of the js frameworks flavors of the week)

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That makes sense. If you're pumping out websites it's quite a different situation from developing large applications that need to run for many years. Same if you're developing lots of little apps.

load more comments (2 replies)