this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
111 points (99.1% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
12 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s “Lunar New Year” now. Of course, there are many lunar calendars with differing starts of the year but let’s just pave over that to Frankenstein together some generic nonspecific holiday because Gyna bad.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] regul@hexbear.net 32 points 11 months ago (31 children)

Calling it Lunar New Year is more inclusive. I can't tell if this is a bit or not.

[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (10 children)

No it’s specifically made to de-Chinafy it and is clearly done via sinophobia due to the recent push.

Using “inclusion” to bulldoze and destroy culture is disgusting. It’s more inclusive to make Hanukkah non-Jewish amirite? Why don’t we just call it Candelabrah and make it non-denominational for everyone to be more inclusive :)

[–] brianary@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

In this case, it's about an astronomical event. The Muslim calendar also uses it.

[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Are red envelopes and Chinese zodiac animals also an astronomical event? You can't have it both ways. You can't copy Chinese New Year verbatim and then change it's name to remove it's specific Chinese character.

[–] brianary@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, fair enough. I haven't seen the celebration yet.

[–] oregoncom@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

fuck off back to whatever hole you crawled out of you cultureless neoliberal drone.

[–] brianary@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Looks like Steam is doing the same thing. This does feel just a little bit like the War on Christmas complaint, though.

[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Christians aren’t an oppressed minority group or subject of colonization. Christmas is as dominant as ever, it’s not under threat or being attacked in any serious way.

Also, the war on Christmas complaint would have validity if a bunch of people from another dominant culture were trying to take it over and rename it and strip it of everything specifics. Having a broad term “happy holidays” for polite conversation that covers multiple holidays (Hanukkah, Christmas, Kwanzaa, Winter Solstice) is fine and different than specifically taking Christmas and renaming it and doing a massive push everywhere to stop calling it Christmas.

[–] brianary@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago

These are fair points.

[–] oregoncom@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The Islamic Calendar doesn't celebrate new years on the same date as Chinese New Years. How fucking stupid are you?

[–] brianary@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago

What's this rage really about?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)