this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
72 points (82.1% liked)
Technology
59377 readers
3042 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
TLDR: WiFi 7 isn't even ratified or "out" yet, so of course there isn't enough hardware for it.
The WiFi 7 standard hasn't even been finalized. It's not unusual to see companies marketing hardware BEFORE final ratification, but it's like a marketing gimmick more than an actual case of "early adoption" hardware. If you're seeing a situation like this one where a few companies sell routers that support the equipment standard, and there's only one of two adapters that do, just stay away. The Wi-Fi Alliance JUST released the WF7 certification criteria on January 8th, so maybe companies will start trying to release hardware now.
I agree that it's very early to go with WiFi 7 at the moment. The issue that I have with the current situation is that Qualcomm managed to make a Wi-Fi 7 adapter which apparently works with AMD and Intel, while the BE200 is 'locked' to their platform only. They didn't even go with CNVi this time. It's just strange and may sway people towards a certain platform due to a simple compatibility issue like this.
Okay, so then the BE200 is an Intel product that offloads to the northbridge or CPU extensions...not that unusual. If it specifically says it supports only Intel chipsets, then you're getting exactly what they are promising, right?
Honestly, I don't know how the BE200 works and whether there's a strict communication protocol only with Intel CPUs. I hope that's not the case and a firmware update will widen its reach. As for why I don't like this situation is that we only get one solution working with one platform. Qualcomm, apparently made it available for both (from what I could find on the web), but since the card is not in stock since maybe November, we're stuck with what Intel wants to feed us. Sure, Intel can do whatever it wants, but it's not really fair for AMD users. Edit: spelling.
My guess after skimming this thread:
Bare bones radio interface with all the smarts being done by CPU extensions and coprocessors in your existing chipset. If you don't have the extensions/coprocessors, no deal.
Very similar to Intel's video decoding enhancements where they stack a bunch of special instructions and hardware in the CPU to take the load off software video decoding.
So if I understand this right, that means you already have wifi7 support, you just need to unlock it with the m.2 shaped key.
I've looked into getting one for my AMD laptop but I haven't actually got one yet. Some models are locked, some are not, here's my research:
BE200.NGWGis a CNVi module and everything except the radio itself was moved into Intel's CPUs, for cost savings.BE200.NGWG.NVis a normal NIC and should support AMD.BE200.NGWG.NVX- same as above but with an X?BE202sucks, avoid it.I checked the official Intel page (https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/230078/intel-wifi-7-be200/specifications.html) and there was no mention of CNVi. If you search for the visual difference between cards that use CNVio2 and those that use PCie, there is an actual difference at the connector level. I still don't think that the BE200 works in the same manner as the AX211.
Yeah, sorry I wrote the comment before I watched the video.