this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
501 points (81.7% liked)

People Twitter

5168 readers
2481 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bluesky Post

TranscriptAlabama suffocated a man to death in a gas chamber tonight after starving him so he wouldn't choke on his own vomit as they did it. And this was deemed perfectly legal by multiple courts in the vaunted American legal system.

That's what happens when you value institutions over people.

Link for more info: https://www.reuters.com/legal/alabama-prepares-carry-out-first-execution-by-nitrogen-asphyxiation-2024-01-25/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 52 points 9 months ago (57 children)

Bluntly, choking on your own vomit is probably a really terrible way to die. If I recall correctly he was put in a chamber where the majority of the air in the room was replaced with nitrous oxide, asphyxiating the subject. If he had choked on his vomit, it would have been closer to drowning than suffocating in the manner that was intended.

By asphyxiating him in this way, his suffering was effectively eliminated during the execution; but if he had vomited and choked on it.... Well, I don't know if you've ever found yourself short of air in a body of water, but it's a pretty unpleasant experience. It only gets worse as you get closer to death when drowning (from what I've heard/understood from people who have nearly drown).

The intention of not giving him food so he didn't vomit, was a humane decision, not intended for additional suffering and cruelty.

Twisting the intent like this is doing a disservice to the entire process. You can dislike capital punishment all you want, and I may even agree that it shouldn't be done, but the fact is, this statement is misleading at best. I'm all for a healthy discussion on it, but let's not conflate the issue with these misconceptions.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 5 points 9 months ago (13 children)

Wouldn't a guillotine be the most foolproof and painless method? The idea sounds a bit primitive, but it's fast and effective I'd say.

I'd take that as an option personally at least.

[–] Mnemnosyne@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Probably the most painless, foolproof method would be an explosive, just strong enough to turn the entire head into a fine mist, placed right at the base of the neck. The explosion propagates faster than neutron activation can happen, so by the time it would be possible to feel anything, the brain no longer exists.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're right. And you also probably meant NEURON activity 😉

[–] Mnemnosyne@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 9 months ago

Haha. Yes I did. Though if it would help, I also wouldn't object to reversing the polarity of the neutron flow. 😁

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago

Agreed, that sounds the most foolproof.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (53 replies)