this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
1106 points (97.8% liked)

memes

10310 readers
1750 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tslnox@reddthat.com 31 points 9 months ago (32 children)

The only valid reason is waterproofing. If the phone isn't waterproof, it's only to limit repairability... Also one factor in that was, I believe, the thinness war, but that's pretty much over now as they all got to the practical limit I guess.

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (6 children)

The Galaxy S5 was IP67 waterproof and had a removable battery and a headphone jack.

[–] xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did they have a stipulation that if the consumer opened the phone the IP rating would be nullified?

Genuinely asking, sounds like something a corpo would do.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)